On 7 April 2020, Singapore entered the “circuit breaker” period which had been announced by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, to pre-empt the escalating number of COVID-19 infections across the country.
This article outlines the various measures that have been implemented, including social distancing, contact tracing and ensuring that individuals stay home as much as possible during the circuit breaker period, as well as the penalties for failing to comply with these measures.
Please note that this article will focus on the measures that individuals have to comply with, as opposed to measures that businesses would need to implement during this period.
What are the Measures That Have Been Put in Place During the COVID-19 Circuit Breaker Period?
On 7 April, following the announcement of the circuit breaker period, Parliament passed a new law, the COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) (Control Order) Regulations 2020 (“Control Order Regulations”).
Part 2 of the Control Order Regulations sets out the restrictions placed on individuals when leaving or entering a place of residence. Under these regulations, all individuals in Singapore are legally required to stay at home and may only leave their places of residence to do the following “directly with all reasonable speed”:
- Work for or with an essential service provider (e.g. healthcare services, food retail, public transportation and ride hailing services), specified schools or early childhood development centres
- Sending children to childcare if the individual or the individual’s spouse works for an essential service provider
- Purchase of essential goods and services (e.g. groceries, medicines)
- Exercise alone or with family members/persons from the same household in green or open spaces (explained further below)
- Seek medical help for a suspected COVID-19 infection or other urgent treatment
- Provide assistance with daily needs to seniors aged 60 or older, children aged 12 or below or individuals with physical or mental disability, where no other assistance is available
- Seek or render help in an emergency
- Comply with the law, for example, a court order
- Report for enlistment or National Service
- Move to a new house
- To leave Singapore
Individuals who have to leave their homes are required to keep a distance of at least one metre from other individuals. These social distancing requirements will be explained in greater detail below.
Are social as well as recreational activities (e.g. exercise) prohibited during the circuit breaker period?
All social gatherings, including private parties in homes and social get-togethers with friends, relatives or family members not living in the same place of residence are strictly prohibited. This is to limit the spread of potential COVID-19 infections through such social interactions.
Similarly, social gatherings in public spaces, such as in parks or void decks of public housing estates, are also prohibited under the regulations.
Regulation 8 of the Control Order Regulations also prohibits the use of common sports or recreation facilities, for example:
- Sports stadiums, private gyms and fitness studios
- Tennis courts or basketball courts located within HDB estates or condominiums,
- Public sports and recreational facilities like public swimming pools and public sports halls.
Such facilities will be closed during the circuit breaker period.
Activities such as fishing and kite-flying are considered recreational activities that are strictly prohibited as they may attract other interested participants and form a crowd.
You may continue to exercise either on your own or with members of your household living with you around your immediate neighbourhood, in open and uncrowded places like public parks.
For example, you are permitted to go jogging at a park near your neighbourhood. However, you must ensure that you observe social distancing measures (see below) at all times while you exercise, and that you return to your home as soon as possible after doing so.
Do note that as of 11 April, National Parks has closed a number of public park facilities, park connectors and gardens to minimise crowd levels. Members of the public are also encouraged to visit this website to check whether a particular park or green space is open and its crowd levels before visiting, and to avoid visiting parks when crowd levels are high.
On the same day, all beaches in Singapore were also closed to the public, in line with ongoing efforts by the government to urge all individuals in Singapore to stay home as much as possible. In addition, public fitness facilities such as neighbourhood playgrounds, fitness corners/stations, water play/water recreational facilities and dog runs have been closed. Open-air stadiums have also been closed since 10 April.
On 12 April, the Singapore Land Authority announced that it will also be closing all playfields with immediate effect, as part of efforts to further curb the spread of COVID-19 infections by preventing groups of people from congregating in such open spaces.
What are the social distancing measures?
Under regulation 7 of the Control Order Regulations, an individual who leaves his/her home for permitted purposes must maintain a distance of at least 1 metre from any other individual, with the exception of lifts, public transport or vehicles.
In public places, this includes:
- Sitting on a seat that is fixed to the floor and not marked as a seat “not to be occupied”, while maintaining 1 metre away from another seated individual;
- Standing 1 metre away from another individual in a queue
What are the Penalties for Breaching the Control Order Regulations?
Section 34(7) of the COVID-19 (Temporary Measures Act) 2020 provides that a person who contravenes any of the provisions under the Control Order Regulations commits an offence and is liable for the following penalties:
- For first-time offenders, a fine up to S$10,000 and/or imprisonment for a term up to 6 months.
- For second and subsequent offenders, a fine up to S$20,000 and/or imprisonment for a term up to 12 months.
On 11 April, Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Masagos Zulkifli announced that with effect from 12 April, individuals who flouted the circuit breaker measures would be fined S$300 right away for a first-time offence. Repeat offenders will face higher fines or prosecution in court for serious cases.
Not Sure What To Do Next?
Get a 20-minute phone call with a lawyer for only $59
Examples: Advice on drug possession, robbery, voluntarily causing grievous hurt, outrage of modesty, fraud, theft, criminal breach of trust etc.
Nadia Moynihan
R.W. Law Practice | 11 years experience | English, Malay
Nadia’s practice represents a broad cross-section of the kind of legal services that most businesses and individuals typically need, regardless of industry sector or client profile, with a particular focus on dispute resolution.
She regularly advises corporate and private clients on schemes of arrangement, bankruptcy proceedings, trade disputes, employment disputes and a wide array of other contractual and tortious claims from fraud to defamation. Her litigation practice draws upon her experience representing clients in complex multi-jurisdictional cases involving misappropriation of funds and shareholder disputes. She has also represented numerous employers and employees in claims relating to wrongful dismissal, breach of employment contracts and harassment in the workplace. She has significant experience handling highly contentious cases of all kinds from State Courts to Court of Appeal level.
Her matrimonial practice features cross-border disputes regarding child custody and the enforcement of maintenance as well as High Court litigation pertaining to the division of substantial matrimonial assets located in multiple jurisdictions. Her criminal practice includes experience representing clients in prosecutions for drug offences, sexual offences and violent offences ranging from voluntarily causing hurt to homicide. She also has experience representing children charged with criminal offences.
Nadia’s non-contentious practice includes the drafting of various commercial agreements such as shareholders’ agreements and distribution agreements as well as personal legal instruments such as wills, lasting powers of attorney and deed polls.
Nadia is on the panel of lawyers of a number of embassies in Singapore.
Qualifications / Admissions
- LLB (Hons), National University of Singapore
- Advocate & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Singapore
- Solicitor of the Senior Courts of England & Wales
Memberships
- Irish Chamber of Commerce, Singapore;
- The Medico-Legal Society of Singapore;
- Association of Criminal Lawyers of Singapore;
- The Law Society’s Family Law Practice Committee
- The Law Society’s Criminal Law Practice Committee;
- Singapore Association of Women Lawyers
- AIJA - International Association of Young Lawyers
Selected Cases
- OMG Holdings Pte Ltd v Pos Ad Sdn Bhd [2012] 4 SLR 231: Pleadings, limitation issue
- BMR v BMS [2013] SGDC 421: Care and control and access of child, maintenance
- JAI v JAI [2014] SGDC 382: Maintenance for wife
- TDI v TDJ [2015] SGFC 11: Care and control, overnight access
- TAT v TAU [2015] SGFC 19: Custody, care and control, access, relocation
- THH v THI [2015] SGFC 135: Interim maintenance for wife and child
- PP v Rosdi Bin Joenet [2016] SGHC 58: Sentencing for homicide in case of mental illness.
- Public Prosecutor v ASR [2018] SGHC 94: Sentencing of intellectually disabled young person for aggravated rape.
Ray Louis
Ray Louis Law Corporation | 14 years experience | English, Malay
Family lawyer Ray Louis has had 14 years of experience as a family counsellor to assist you with your separation, contested or uncontested divorce, and other family-related proceedings. Clients appreciate his affordable legal expertise and sensitivity to personal situations. He has worked on behalf of many local and overseas clients, in cases that include international…
Che Wei Chin
Fervent Chambers | 12 years experience | English, Mandarin
In the field of litigation, Wei Chin was lead counsel for many types of matters and clients such as:
- Civil and commercial disputes
- Submitting and presenting mitigation pleas successfully to obtain lighter sentences for clients charged in criminal matters, including non-custodial sentences
- Divorce and ancillary matters disputes, including helping parties through Court Mediation
- Private prosecutions for a government statutory board and obtaining deterrent sentences against the offenders
- General solicitors’ work in extracting Grant of Probate and Letters of Administration
- General solicitors’ work in managing landlord and tenancy agreements and disputes
- General Commercial Drafting and Advisory Work
His wide range of experience in litigation includes tenancy disputes, writs of possession, claims concerning breaches of director’s duties, probate matters, criminal matters, matrimonial matters and various other types of litigation work.
Wei Chin recognises that not all matters need to proceed for a full-fledged trial. Having taken Mediation & Negotiation modules in NUS, Wei Chin can capably advise on settlement options, achieving an amicable resolution which is more affordable and efficient than going for trial.
Wei Chin has also advised government agencies and statutory boards, helping them to resolve disputes through negotiations and litigation, depending on their goals and aims.
Wei Chin also takes on commercial contract drafting and contractual negotiation work to protect the interest of his clients when they are entering commercial deals. He has experience being a legal advisor to a local tertiary educational institute and assisted in vetting their intellectual property contracts.
Civil & Commercial Disputes
- Lead Counsel in a dispute involving an ex-finance manager of a renowned bakery being sued for breach of fiduciary duties and other money claims – successfully defended the manager such that all claims were dismissed.
- Lead counsel in contract dispute regarding business consultancy agreements, limitation issues and Legal Profession Act.
- Lead counsel in construction dispute with interior designer for defective works.
- Lead counsel in a supply agreement dispute concerning a local beautician boutique.
- Negotiating a successful settlement involving a potentially Michelin-starred restaurant and its renovation contractors, avoiding a lawsuit of close to $0.4 million.
- Lead counsel in a High Court claim for contractual breach: acted for an independent business consultant in suing 3 business owners for breach of consultancy agreement.
- Lead counsel in High Court defamation claim of a manager defaming a director of a listed company.
- Negotiating a successful settlement involving a defamation claim by a businessman against a university professor.
- Assisting counsel in obtaining a Mareva Injunction for a claim amounting to more than S$3 million.
- Negotiating a successful settlement involving an anti-competition lawsuit by a large rice supplier, thus preventing a prohibitive injunction.
- Advising and successfully negotiating a settlement for a government statutory board concerning a dispute with an oil supplier.
Criminal Matters
- Lead Counsel in a disposal enquiry between two victims of a Bitcoin scam.
- Lead counsel in securing an acquittal for client charged with criminal trespass and outrage of modesty in Marina Bay Sand hotel.
- Lead counsel in successfully securing probation for an Uber driver suffering from frotteurism who touched passenger’s thigh. During appeal by the Prosecution, the Accused did not appoint Mr Che as a lawyer (due to financial constraints). Accused’s sentence was later increased to imprisonment when fresh facts arose during appeal.
- Lead counsel in a shop theft matter where Accused took toys without payment from a well-known toy store.
- Lead counsel in various plead guilty matters for offences regarding:
- Penal Code Section 377BB (voyeurism)
- Penal Code Section s. 405 to 409 (criminal breach of trust)
- Companies Act Section 157 (breach of company director’s duties)
- Road Traffic Act (reckless driving, drink driving etc)
- Common Gaming House Act (gambling)
- Animals and Birds Act 1965 (importation of live animals etc)
Gino Hardial Singh
Abbots Chambers LLC | 22 years experience | English
Prior to incorporating Abbots, Gino headed the criminal litigation departments of firms he practiced in. He is an experienced and dedicated trial lawyer who focuses his litigation practice on white collar crimes. He is also confident of fighting for persons accused of committing Murder, Drug Trafficking, Robbery, Rape, Sexual Assault, Rioting and offences against Public Servants and has obtained good results.
Ashvin Hariharan
IRB Law LLP | 5 years experience | English, Tamil
Ashvin has represented accused persons in both the State Courts and High Court, in cases spanning a variety of offences, including cheating, criminal breach of trust, rioting, sexual offences, money laundering, corruption and road traffic offences. Ashvin has also assisted numerous clients through investigations and interviews by the Singapore Police Force, Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
Ronald Yeo
Yeo Marini Law Corporation | 8 years experience | English, Hokkien, Mandarin
Ronald started off his career as an economist before deciding to pursue a second degree in law. He has worked as a legal counsel in both public and private sector including various international banks. However, the corporate career gave him less satisfaction as compared to helping the layperson. Coupled with his passion to serve and connect with people on the ground, Ronald decided to go back to his original roots and to practise community law.
A person-oriented individual with a practical and realistic mindset, Ronald is able to provide advice with sound reasoning, and at the same time, ensure that it is in the best interest for the client. Hardworking and output driven, he is a hands-on lawyer who sees through any matter from start to finish.
Ronald has a particular interest in family law. Being a father of 3 children himself, he is a strong advocate of being a present parent and understands the challenges one faces during the course of marriage. He believes that the child’s interest is of utmost importance in any marriage. Ronald is able to empathize and apply his legal mind in matters relating to child custody, care and control, and maintenance quantum for children. When push comes to shove and marriage is no longer possible, Ronald is able to represent clients for any divorce proceedings, both contested and uncontested.
Ronald is able to speak both the Chinese and English language.
Rohit K Singh
REGAL LAW LLC | 3 years experience | Bahasa Indonesia, English, Hindi, Malay, Urdu
Rohit K. Singh is a criminal defence lawyer whose practice is focused primarily on criminal litigation, investigations, regulatory enforcement matters, and advocacy before tribunals and courts in Singapore. Having cut his teeth in criminal defence work from the outset of his career, Rohit has represented individuals at every stage of the criminal justice process, from investigations and arrest through to trial, sentencing, appeals, and post-conviction proceedings.
Rohit regularly acts as a criminal lawyer in Singapore for individuals facing police investigations, arrests, CNB investigations, commercial crime investigations, white-collar crime allegations, and regulatory enforcement actions. He frequently engages investigative and prosecutorial authorities before charges are preferred, with a view towards achieving the best possible outcome for his clients through strategic and early intervention.
Rohit regularly advises and represents clients in matters involving theft, cheating, criminal breach of trust, extortion, outrage of modesty, molestation, rape and sexual offences, criminal intimidation, harassment, voluntarily causing hurt, voluntarily causing grievous hurt, domestic violence, family violence, maid abuse, abuse of vulnerable persons, child-related offences, rioting, unlawful assembly, money laundering, corruption, customs offences, immigration offences, road traffic offences, vice-related offences, and offences under the Penal Code and various regulatory statutes. He has acted for both complainants and accused persons in domestic abuse and family violence matters, including applications involving Personal Protection Orders, as well as criminal proceedings arising from allegations of assault within family settings.
A significant aspect of Rohit's practice involves engaging authorities at the earliest possible stage of an investigation. He firmly believes that strategic intervention before charges are preferred can often have a decisive impact on the eventual outcome of a case. He regularly prepares representations to investigative and prosecutorial authorities with the objective of securing No Further Action outcomes, Stern Warnings, Conditional Warnings, composition offers, reduced charges, or alternative resolutions where appropriate.
Rohit has successfully acted for clients during police and regulatory investigations where early engagement resulted in investigations being discontinued or resolved without prosecution. He adopts a proactive and practical approach, guiding clients through statement recording sessions, interviews, arrests, bail matters, enforcement actions, search and seizure exercises, and regulatory investigations while safeguarding their legal rights throughout the process.
His criminal practice extends to drug-related offences and CNB investigations. Rohit has experience handling Drug Rehabilitation Centre ("DRC") matters, DRC appeals, and representations relating to Enhanced Drug Supervision Orders ("EDSO"). He regularly advances rehabilitation-focused arguments supported by medical, factual, and legal evidence, seeking outcomes that emphasise treatment and reintegration rather than incarceration where the circumstances permit. He believes that engaging CNB and relevant authorities at an early stage frequently provides the best opportunity to secure rehabilitative outcomes and has successfully obtained favourable outcomes for suitable clients.
Rohit also possesses significant experience in regulatory and enforcement matters involving the Ministry of Manpower ("MOM") and Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore ("IRAS"). He advises businesses and individuals facing employment-related investigations, work pass offences, CPF-related issues, tax investigations, compliance breaches, and enforcement proceedings. He is experienced in navigating complex statutory frameworks and engaging regulators to mitigate exposure and achieve practical solutions.
In addition to criminal litigation, Rohit regularly appears before disciplinary and regulatory tribunals. He has acted in proceedings before the Council for Estate Agencies ("CEA") involving allegations of professional misconduct, regulatory breaches, suspension proceedings, and compliance issues affecting property agents and real estate professionals.
His advocacy experience extends beyond conventional criminal proceedings. Rohit has undertaken work before military tribunals, including General Court Martial proceedings, as well as matters before the Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act ("CLTPA") Advisory Committee. In CLTPA matters, he prepares detailed representations and submissions challenging detention orders and advocating for release, variation, or reduction of detention periods.
Rohit has represented clients before a broad range of forums, ranging from disciplinary tribunals and regulatory bodies to the State Courts and the Singapore High Court. He has also acted in matters involving youth offenders, probation applications, reformative training, community-based sentences, and regulatory disciplinary proceedings. This breadth of experience allows him to provide practical, strategic, and tailored advice regardless of the complexity of the matter.
He has a particular focus on youth offender cases and firmly believes that rehabilitation should remain a central consideration for young offenders. Rohit regularly advances applications for probation, community-based sentences, reformative training alternatives, and other rehabilitative sentencing options. His mitigation strategies focus not only on the offending conduct but also on the underlying circumstances that contributed to the offence, with the ultimate aim of promoting long-term reintegration into society.
Clients value Rohit's meticulous preparation, accessibility, pragmatic advice, and firm advocacy. He is committed to achieving proportionate and just outcomes while guiding clients through what is often one of the most challenging periods of their lives.
Areas of Practice
- Criminal Defence
- Criminal Investigations
- Police Investigations and Statement Recording
- Drug Offences and CNB Matters
- Drug Rehabilitation Centre (DRC) Matters and Appeals
- Enhanced Drug Supervision Order (EDSO) Representations
- Theft, Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust Offences
- Money Laundering and Financial Crime
- Sexual Offences and Outrage of Modesty Cases
- Assault, Hurt and Grievous Hurt Offences
- Domestic Violence and Family Violence Matters
- Maid Abuse and Vulnerable Victim Offences
- White-Collar and Regulatory Crime
- Ministry of Manpower (MOM) Investigations
- Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) Investigations
- Singapore Customs Offences
- Council for Estate Agencies (CEA) Disciplinary Proceedings
- Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act (CLTPA) Matters
- Youth Offender Representation
- Probation and Community-Based Sentencing
- Bail Applications and Criminal Motions
- Criminal Appeals
- Personal Protection Order (PPO) Matters
- Family Law (Divorce, Probate, Letters of Administration, Adoption and Guardianship)
- Corporate and Commercial Matters
Education
Bachelor of Laws, Murdoch University (2021)
Admissions and Memberships
Advocate and Solicitor, Singapore
Member, Law Society of Singapore
Member, Singapore Academy of Law
Volunteer Lawyer, Criminal Legal Aid Scheme (CLAS)
Languages
English
Bahasa Melayu
Hindi
Urdu
Bhojpuri
Interests
Outside legal practice, Rohit is an avid football fan and a lifelong supporter of Liverpool Football Club. He enjoys both watching and playing football. He also has a longstanding passion for aquariums and maintains a collection of predatory freshwater fish. Away from work, he enjoys spending time with his four cats and is an enthusiastic watch collector with an appreciation for both luxury and vintage timepieces.
Am I Allowed to Travel Overseas during the COVID-19 Outbreak?
On 18 March, the Government advised all Singaporeans to defer all non-essential overseas travel with immediate effect to curb the risk of Singaporeans becoming infected while overseas, and subsequently spreading the infection to other Singaporeans when they return.
From 27 March, it was announced that any Singapore resident or long-term pass holder who leaves Singapore will be charged unsubsidised rates for inpatient stays at public hospitals if they are admitted for suspected COVID-19, and display an onset of symptoms within 14 days of their return to Singapore.
The Ministry of Health also added that Singapore residents will not be able to claim from MediShield Life or Integrated Shield plans for such treatments at both public and private hospitals in such cases.
In addition, work-pass holders or their dependants who leave Singapore from 27 March will be deprioritised for entry approval and can expect delays before they are permitted to return to Singapore if they continue to travel abroad and return infected.
How Long Will the COVID-19 Circuit Breaker Period Last?
Under regulation 1(2), the Control Order Regulations governing the current circuit breaker period will be in force from 7 April 2020 to 4 May 2020 (both dates inclusive).
Do note that under section 34 of the COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Act 2020, the Government can make new regulations to extend the duration of the circuit breaker period if it is deemed necessary to do so.
COVID-19 Contact Tracing Measures
What happens if I hinder or obstruct contact tracing efforts by the authorities?
The Government has been using contact tracing to identify persons who might have come into close contact with a COVID-19-infected individual, and might be at risk of contracting COVID-19 as a result. This ensures that such individuals are quarantined or put on notice to monitor any symptoms, in an effort to curb the spread of infections.
Under section 64 of the Infectious Diseases Act, it is an offence for an individual to hinder or obstruct the contact tracing process, or provide false or misleading information or documents that might be required during the contact tracing process.
First-time offenders can be liable to a fine of up to S$10,000 and or imprisonment for a term of up to 6 months. For second or subsequent offences, offenders can be fined up to S$20,000 and/or be imprisoned for a term of up to 12 months.
In February, a couple from China were the first people to be charged under the Infectious Diseases Act for providing false information about their movements, which obstructed the contact tracing process. The authorities have stressed the serious implications of providing false information and the risks posed to public health as a result.
What happens if I breach a stay-home notice / leave of absence / quarantine order?
The Government takes a strict view of breaches of stay-home notices, leave of absence, and quarantine orders.
The table below provides an overview of these orders:
|
Stay-Home Notice |
Leave of Absence (LOA) |
Quarantine Order |
| What is it? |
A more strict regime compared to LOA, individuals have to remain in their place of residence at all times and are not permitted to invite visitors to their residence. |
A precautionary measure where employees are placed on LOA, and advised to remain in their residences as much as possible and minimise visitors. They may leave their residences for daily necessities or attend to important matters, but must minimise time spent in public. |
A legal order issued to individuals under the Infectious Diseases Act to quarantine or isolate an individual who is or is suspected to be infected with COVID-19 or is in contact of a COVID-19-infected person. |
| Where is the individual required to stay?? |
Dedicated Stay-Home Notice facilities in Singapore |
At the residence/home of the individual |
Either the residence/home of the individual or dedicated Government Quarantine facilities or hospitals |
| How long does it last? |
14 days |
14 days |
The quarantine period will be specified in the order |
| Who does it apply to? |
As of 9 April, it applies to all Singapore Citizens, Permanent Residents and Long-term Pass Holders entering Singapore from all countries |
Preschool and primary school students staying in the same household as a person who has returned from any country from 25 March 2020, and is serving their Stay-Home Notice at home |
Singapore Residents and Long-term Pass Holders returning from Hubei Province and close contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases |
Penalties for Singaporeans who breach these orders
On 26 March, the Ministry of Health put into effect new regulations regarding stay-home notices, namely the Infectious Diseases (COVID-19 – Stay Orders) Regulations 2020.
Under these regulations, offenders who breach stay-home notice orders can be found guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of up to S$10,000 and/or imprisonment for a term of up to 6 months.
On 7 April, a Singaporean was charged for breaching a stay-home notice to have a bak kut teh meal at a hawker centre. He then subsequently travelled to and visited various other public places, including food centres and a shopping mall, across Singapore while he was supposed to be serving the stay-home notice.
Penalties for Permanent Residents (PRs)/foreigners who breach these orders
For non-Singapore citizens, other administrative actions, such as the revocation of or shortening the validity of their permits and passes to remain in Singapore, may be undertaken by the authorities for their breaching of stay-home notice requirements.
Earlier in February, a man lost his Singapore permanent residency status for breaching a stay-home notice given in light of his recent travel history to China. He had insisted on leaving Singapore despite the stay-home notice requirements and the ICA subsequently rejected his application for the renewal of his re-entry permit. Such renewal would have allowed him to retain his PR status while he was outside of Singapore.
The authorities have also taken strict enforcement action against foreigners for breaching such orders. In early February, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) revoked the work passes of 4 people who were caught working at their places of employment when they were supposed to have taken a Leave of Absence (LOA).
They were repatriated within a 24-hour period and banned from working in Singapore permanently. Their 6 employers also had their work pass privileges suspended for 2 years for breaching the LOA requirements.
More recently on 12 April, a work pass holder working for an essential service provider had his work pass revoked for loitering at various places in breach of the recent circuit breaker measures. He has also been permanently banned from working in Singapore.
Similarly, on 13 April, MOM announced that it had revoked the permits of 24 work pass holders for breaching the circuit breaker measures by eating, drinking and gathering in groups in the vicinity of their dormitory.
—
The success of the circuit breaker measures depends on the efforts of each and every individual to do their part to stay home as much as possible, and to practise social distancing if they have to leave their homes for essential activities.
As Singapore’s laws to contain the spread of COVID-19 are changing rapidly, it is important that you continue to keep updated of developments from the Government. You should also abide by the measures that have been put in place to protect your well-being and those of others around you.