The COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Act 2020 (“the Act”) was recently passed by the Singapore government with the aim, among other things, of providing relief to parties who may be adversely affected in the conduct of their commercial dealings by the COVID-19 pandemic.
It does this primarily by postponing the legal consequences of a party’s failure to discharge a relevant contractual obligation (e.g. the payment of rent or the booking of venues for events, like weddings, where venue deposits have been paid), where such legal consequences include being sued or having a bond or collateral forfeited.
The parts of the Act that provide such relief have come into operation as of 20 April 2020.
Not Sure What To Do Next?
Get a 20-minute phone call with a lawyer for only $59
Examples: Advice on starting a business, contracts and agreements, winding up etc.
Nadia Moynihan
R.W. Law Practice | 11 years experience | English, Malay
Nadia’s practice represents a broad cross-section of the kind of legal services that most businesses and individuals typically need, regardless of industry sector or client profile, with a particular focus on dispute resolution.
She regularly advises corporate and private clients on schemes of arrangement, bankruptcy proceedings, trade disputes, employment disputes and a wide array of other contractual and tortious claims from fraud to defamation. Her litigation practice draws upon her experience representing clients in complex multi-jurisdictional cases involving misappropriation of funds and shareholder disputes. She has also represented numerous employers and employees in claims relating to wrongful dismissal, breach of employment contracts and harassment in the workplace. She has significant experience handling highly contentious cases of all kinds from State Courts to Court of Appeal level.
Her matrimonial practice features cross-border disputes regarding child custody and the enforcement of maintenance as well as High Court litigation pertaining to the division of substantial matrimonial assets located in multiple jurisdictions. Her criminal practice includes experience representing clients in prosecutions for drug offences, sexual offences and violent offences ranging from voluntarily causing hurt to homicide. She also has experience representing children charged with criminal offences.
Nadia’s non-contentious practice includes the drafting of various commercial agreements such as shareholders’ agreements and distribution agreements as well as personal legal instruments such as wills, lasting powers of attorney and deed polls.
Nadia is on the panel of lawyers of a number of embassies in Singapore.
Qualifications / Admissions
- LLB (Hons), National University of Singapore
- Advocate & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Singapore
- Solicitor of the Senior Courts of England & Wales
Memberships
- Irish Chamber of Commerce, Singapore;
- The Medico-Legal Society of Singapore;
- Association of Criminal Lawyers of Singapore;
- The Law Society’s Family Law Practice Committee
- The Law Society’s Criminal Law Practice Committee;
- Singapore Association of Women Lawyers
- AIJA - International Association of Young Lawyers
Selected Cases
- OMG Holdings Pte Ltd v Pos Ad Sdn Bhd [2012] 4 SLR 231: Pleadings, limitation issue
- BMR v BMS [2013] SGDC 421: Care and control and access of child, maintenance
- JAI v JAI [2014] SGDC 382: Maintenance for wife
- TDI v TDJ [2015] SGFC 11: Care and control, overnight access
- TAT v TAU [2015] SGFC 19: Custody, care and control, access, relocation
- THH v THI [2015] SGFC 135: Interim maintenance for wife and child
- PP v Rosdi Bin Joenet [2016] SGHC 58: Sentencing for homicide in case of mental illness.
- Public Prosecutor v ASR [2018] SGHC 94: Sentencing of intellectually disabled young person for aggravated rape.
Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss
Robert Wang & Woo LLP | 33 years experience | English, Mandarin
Working with clients to help them find real solutions to legal issues that are causing them stress and worry isn’t just a job, it’s something I’m passionate about. It’s a calling. I was called to the Singapore Bar in 1989, and have since chalked up three decades of active legal practice. I’ve acquired the experience and knowledge across a diverse range of legal matters, enabling me to bring a broad-based approach to problem-solving. Where a fight is called for, I’ll bring a hands-on and passionate approach to advocating and championing my clients’ interests.
Ronald Yeo
Yeo Marini Law Corporation | 8 years experience | English, Hokkien, Mandarin
Ronald started off his career as an economist before deciding to pursue a second degree in law. He has worked as a legal counsel in both public and private sector including various international banks. However, the corporate career gave him less satisfaction as compared to helping the layperson. Coupled with his passion to serve and connect with people on the ground, Ronald decided to go back to his original roots and to practise community law.
A person-oriented individual with a practical and realistic mindset, Ronald is able to provide advice with sound reasoning, and at the same time, ensure that it is in the best interest for the client. Hardworking and output driven, he is a hands-on lawyer who sees through any matter from start to finish.
Ronald has a particular interest in family law. Being a father of 3 children himself, he is a strong advocate of being a present parent and understands the challenges one faces during the course of marriage. He believes that the child’s interest is of utmost importance in any marriage. Ronald is able to empathize and apply his legal mind in matters relating to child custody, care and control, and maintenance quantum for children. When push comes to shove and marriage is no longer possible, Ronald is able to represent clients for any divorce proceedings, both contested and uncontested.
Ronald is able to speak both the Chinese and English language.
What Does the Act Cover?
The parties who will be covered by this relief are any party who is unable to perform a contractual obligation that is due to be performed on or after 1 February 2020, pursuant to any contract entered into or renewed before 25 March 2020. However, only certain kinds of contracts are covered by the Act.
They are:
- Certain kinds of commercial loans to a business (e.g. secured loans financed by a licensed bank/finance company);
- A performance bond granted pursuant to a construction contract or supply contract;
- Hire-purchase agreements and conditional sales agreements for plant, machinery or fixed assets used for manufacturing, production or other business purpose or for a commercial vehicle;
- Event contracts (such as for wedding venue bookings);
- Tourism-related contracts;
- Construction contracts or supply contracts; and
- Commercial leases.
Parties which may be able to make use of the relief under the Act include businesses, such as restaurants, or individuals such as tenants or tour bus drivers who cannot afford to pay their rent due to COVID-19, and risk having their deposits or vehicles forfeited or repossessed, respectively.
How Can One Seek Relief Under the Act?
To claim the benefit of these reliefs, one need only send a notification to the other party or parties to the contract (and one’s guarantor or surety, if any, for whatever obligation from which one is seeking relief) providing any relevant information and explaining why it is not currently possible to discharge the relevant contractual obligation.
The other party or parties, if they think it is unreasonable for you to be completely relieved of your contractual obligations, will be temporarily prevented from commencing legal action against you to compel you to discharge those obligations.
They can, however, refer the matter to an assessor, who will have the power to determine whether your contract falls within the scope of the Act and whether you should therefore be entitled to relief, or whether part or all of any deposit you have paid should be forfeited. Parties cannot be represented by lawyers during this assessment and also cannot appeal the assessor’s decision.
To apply for such an assessment, the other party must pay a fee and serve a copy of the application on all the parties to the contract (and any guarantor or surety).
If a party does not go through this whole process, but instead simply keeps the entire deposit or commences legal action, in breach of the Act, they are guilty of an offence and can be fined up to $1,000 and ordered to return any deposit taken to the other party.
How Long is the Relief Period and What Happens After That?
The relief from one’s obligation to discharge one’s contractual duties starts from 20 April 2020. The end date of the relief depends on the type of contract that the parties are under:
| Types of contracts |
Relief period |
- Commercial leases and licences
- Loans to Small-and-Medium Enterprises secured by certain collateral in Singapore
|
20 April 2020 to 19 November 2020 |
- Event and tourism-related contracts
|
20 April 2020 to 31 January 2021 |
- Hire-purchase and conditional sales agreements for commercial vehicles, or commercial plant/machinery
- Lease or rental agreements for commercial equipment or commercial vehicles
|
20 April 2020 to 31 January 2021 |
- Options to purchase and sale and purchase agreements with developers
|
20 April 2020 to 30 June 2021 |
- Construction contracts or supply contracts, or any performance bond granted thereto
|
20 April 2020 to 31 December 2021 |
At the end of the relief period, all contractual obligations become due and parties can be sued for them again, and deposits can be forfeited.
—
If your business is adversely impacted by COVID-19 and you find yourself unable to meet your contractual obligations, you should consult a lawyer to establish whether your business may fall within the scope of the Act and be entitled to relief.
The lawyer can then advise you on whether and how to serve a notice for relief. If you have notified your counterparty under the Act, and they still take your deposit, you should seek legal advice immediately to receive guidance on referring the case to an assessor to have your deposit refunded to you.
Even if you are the one being served with a notice for relief under the Act by a counterparty to a contract, you should also speak to a lawyer.
A lawyer will be able to determine the likelihood of that notice being invalidated by an assessor and prepare the best possible case for challenging a defective notice or a notice arising out of a contract that should not be covered by the Act.