Can I Sue a Foreigner in Singapore?
Having knowledge of how to sue a foreigner in Singapore is extremely useful, especially if one has personal or business dealings with foreigners or foreign companies in Singapore. This article provides a guide on how one can bring a lawsuit against a foreigner in Singapore.
The issue of whether one can sue a foreigner in Singapore concerns the jurisdiction of the Singapore courts, i.e. whether the court has the right to hear the case. The jurisdictional issue is determined by whether the intended defendant, who may be a natural person or a corporation, is situated in Singapore or abroad. Thus, the jurisdictional issue may be broadly posed as two questions:
- Is the intended defendant situated in Singapore or abroad?
- Is the intended defendant a natural person or a corporation?
In all instances, the plaintiff should also be located in Singapore to bring a lawsuit against a foreigner in Singapore.
Foreigner situated in Singapore
A foreigner situated in Singapore has to be personally served with a writ of summons for the court to obtain jurisdiction over this foreigner.
A crucial characteristic of service within Singapore’s jurisdiction is that it is as of right – this means that the plaintiff can simply obtain process documents of the court, and he will have naturally have the right to serve the documents on the defendant. This differs from service out of Singapore’s jurisdiction on a foreigner, which requires leave from court to be obtained before service can be effected. This will be elaborated on below.
Slightly different rules apply if one wishes to sue a company situated in Singapore. A company may be served within Singapore if it is “physically present” in Singapore. Under common law, a company is present if it has been carrying on business in a fixed place of business within Singapore for a minimal period of time. Nonetheless, all circumstances will be taken into consideration to determine whether sufficiently substantial business had been carried out within Singapore, such that the company can be regarded as present within Singapore.
For a company physically present in Singapore, personal service has to be effected on an officer of the corporation. Personal service may also be effected on an agent of the company. However, the agent must have had the authority to run the business, and control or management over such business occurring within Singapore which is related to the cause of action.
For a foreign company incorporated under Singapore law, it is possible to serve legal documents on the company by leaving them at or sending them by registered post to the company’s registered address.
For branches of foreign companies registered in Singapore, service can be effected by leaving the service documents at or sending them by post to its registered office, or the registered address of its agent. However, these registered foreign companies must be in compliance with the Companies Act with regard to the following requirements:
- they must be registered in Singapore;
- they must have a registered office in Singapore; and
- they must appoint two or more natural persons resident in Singapore as agents authorised to accept any service of process on its behalf.
Foreigner situated abroad
Before one can bring a lawsuit against a foreigner situated abroad, it is necessary for the plaintiff to apply to the Singapore courts for leave (i.e. permission) to effect personal service on the intended foreign defendant. To obtain such leave of court, the plaintiff must prove the following:
- One of the heads of jurisdiction prescribed in Order 11 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court is fulfilled on the basis of ‘a good arguable case’;
- There is a serious issue to be tried on the merits; and
- Singapore is a proper forum to try the action.
The above requirements apply equally to foreign corporations and natural persons alike. Fulfilling these three requirements will ensure that the case is a “proper” one for service out of Singapore, and the court will accordingly grant leave to the plaintiff to serve a writ on the foreigner abroad. As leave is granted without notice to the potential defendant, full and frank disclosure of all material facts is required. Ultimately, this makes effecting service on a foreigner situated abroad more complicated than effecting service on a foreigner situated in Singapore.
(1) Heads of jurisdiction under Order 11 of the Rules of Court
There must be a “good arguable case” that the claim comes within one of the 18 specified heads of jurisdiction under Order 11 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court.
One of the heads of jurisdiction specifies that a defendant may be served outside Singapore with leave of court if he is domiciled, ordinarily resident, or carrying on business, or has property in Singapore. This provision is not confined to corporations and may apply to natural persons. It should be noted that an individual carrying on business in Singapore, whether by an agent or otherwise, can be brought within the jurisdiction of the Singapore court under this provision.
Other heads of jurisdiction under Order 11 Rule 1 include, but are not limited to, the following:
- Leave may be granted where the plaintiff is claiming to “enforce, rescind, dissolve, annul or otherwise affect a contract, or to recover damages or obtain other relief in respect of the breach of contract”, and if the contract is linked to Singapore in a specified way;
- Leave may be granted by court for service out of jurisdiction if the plaintiff’s claim is founded on a cause of action arising in Singapore;
- Leave may be granted in tort cases where the claim is founded on a tort, wherever committed, which is founded at least in part by an act or omission occurring in Singapore;
- Leave may be granted for service out of jurisdiction where an injunction is sought ordering the defendant to do or refrain from doing anything in Singapore.
(2) Serious issue to be tried on the merits
To show that there is a “proper” case for service out of jurisdiction, the plaintiff must also convince the court that there is a serious issue to be tried on the merits of the case. This generally refers to a substantial question of fact or law which the plaintiff has a genuine desire to be tried.
(3) Singapore is the proper forum for the case to be heard
To show a “proper” case for service out of jurisdiction, it is necessary for the defendant to convince the Singapore court that Singapore is the natural forum to try the case.
To determine whether Singapore is the natural forum to try the case, the courts will enquire if Singapore is the forum where the case may be most suitably tried for all the parties and the ends of justice (the Spiliada test). The legal test involves two steps:
- First, the court will consider whether Singapore is the jurisdiction which has the closest and most real connection with the dispute
- Second, the court will consider if there will be a denial of justice if the case is tried in that jurisdiction.
The plaintiff will have the burden of proving that Singapore fulfils these requirements.
As an application for leave of court to serve on a foreign defendant situated abroad involves complex legal analysis, it is highly advisable that you engage a lawyer to assist you.
Overarching consideration: Is it practical to sue in Singapore?
In making the decision to sue a foreign defendant in Singapore, it is important to consider if it is worthwhile and practical to do so. Some of the practical considerations are highlighted below.
Does the foreign defendant have assets in Singapore?
An important consideration would be whether the foreigner has any assets in Singapore for the judgment to be enforced against. For example, it would be practical to attempt to enforce a Mareva injunction against a foreigner defendant in a Singapore court if all his assets are in Singapore.
However, if the foreigner defendant has most of his assets in other countries, then it would be prudent for the plaintiff to first determine if that jurisdiction would recognise and enforce a Singapore judgment before commencing legal proceedings in Singapore.
Does the cause of action concern foreign immovable property?
It should be noted that the Singapore court has no jurisdiction to hear disputes involving title to or rights of possession in foreign immovable property. This includes claims for the proceeds of the sale of immovable property, if the claim turns upon a question of title or possessory right. Nonetheless, this is subject to several exceptions, one of which is where the claim is based on a contract or personal equity between parties.
- Differences between Criminal Law and Civil Law
- Should You Sue? 8 Things to Think About Before Suing
- How to Write a Cease and Desist Letter in Singapore
- Limitation Periods: What's the Deadline for Suing in Singapore?
- What to Do If Someone Sues Your Singapore Business
- Arbitration and Mediation: When They Can be Useful for Business Disputes
- Can I Sue a Foreigner in Singapore?
- Mediation in Singapore
- Arbitration: When and How to Arbitrate Business Disputes in Singapore
- 6 Things You Need to Know about Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration
- Using Neutral Evaluation to Resolve Civil Disputes in Singapore
- Letters of Demand and Their Usages in Singapore
- Law on Writ of Summons in Singapore
- Received a "Without Prejudice" Letter? Here’s What It Means
- What if I Cannot Find the Party I Want to Sue?
- Making a Claim in the Small Claims Tribunals in Singapore
- First Meeting With Your Business Dispute Lawyer: What to Expect
- Negotiating a Settlement in a Business Dispute
- Security of Payment Act: Claiming Progress Payments for Construction Work Done
- Engaging a Queen’s Counsel in Singapore
- Admissibility of Evidence in the Singapore Courts
- Subpoenaed to be a Court Witness in Singapore: What You Need to Do
- Who is an Expert Witness and How to Use Expert Evidence in Singapore
- Destroying and Tampering With Evidence in Singapore
- Legal DNA Test: What is It For, How It’s Conducted, Cost & More