Using the Defence of Diminished Responsibility in Singapore
One Friday evening, a grandmother strangles her grand-daughter to death after a particularly heated argument. The grandmother had been looking after the grand-daughter since the girl was a baby, along with her two other grandchildren and severely disabled son.
Months before the murder occurred, however, the grandmother suffered from severe mental health issues, stress, and caregiver burnout. Should the grandmother be held fully accountable for the murder, or was her responsibility for killing her granddaughter diminished in some way?
This article explains:
- The defence of diminished responsibility in Singapore
- The difference between the defence of diminished responsibility and unsoundness of mind
- When the defence of diminished responsibility can be raised
- What happens if the defence of diminished responsibility is successfully raised
What is the Defence of Diminished Responsibility in Singapore?
The defence of diminished responsibility is a partial defence or special exception to the offence of murder under section 300 of the Penal Code in Singapore. It proves that, at the time of the offence, the accused was suffering from a specific abnormality of mind that has:
- Substantially impaired the offender’s capacity to either:
- Know the nature of their acts or omissions that either caused the death, or in being a party to causing the death; or
- Know whether such acts or omissions are wrong or against the law; or
- Substantially impaired the offender’s power to control his acts or commissions in causing the death or being a party to causing the death.
If successfully pleaded, the defence of diminished responsibility reduces the criminal liability of a person accused of murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
What is the Difference Between the Defence of Diminished Responsibility and Unsoundness of Mind?
Unsoundness of mind is found under section 84 of the Penal Code, which provides that nothing is an offence if it is done by a person who is:
- Incapable of knowing the nature of the act committed;
- Incapable of knowing that what he is doing is wrong or against the law; or
- Has completely no control over his actions.
The defence of diminished responsibility hence differs from unsoundness of mind in the following ways:
The mental condition and state of the accused
Unsoundness of mind suggests a complete incapacity or the total inability of the accused to know that his actions are wrong or against the law, or to control them.
On the other hand, the defence of diminished responsibility suggests only a diminished, or partial, incapacity at the time of commission of the offence.
The accused, in this case, still retains the mental capacity to know both the nature and wrongfulness of his act. However, he had been suffering from a mental condition that substantially impaired – as opposed to fully impaired – his mental state when he committed the act in question.
The offences for which the defence applies
While the defence of diminished responsibility applies as a defence to only the offence of murder, unsoundness of mind can be applied to not just murder but other criminal offences as well.
The effect of a successful defence
An accused person who successfully pleads unsoundness of mind will not be held criminally liable or accountable for the offence that was committed, and he may be acquitted.
However, if the court finds that the accused would have been found guilty of committing the offence if he had not been suffering from an unsound mind, the accused will be placed in safe custody and undergo treatment to ensure that he will not present a danger to himself or to other persons when he is released.
For more on the defence of unsoundness of mind in Singapore, you may refer to our other article on this subject.
On the other hand, an accused person who successfully raises the defence of diminished responsibility will still be held criminally liable for the offence that was committed. However, his charge will be reduced to one of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under section 304 of the Penal Code instead.
Learn more about the differences between murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder in our other article.
When Might an Accused be Able to Raise the Defence of diminished Responsibility?
In the case of Public Prosecutor v Boh Soon Ho, the Singapore High Court affirmed that the following three cumulative conditions must be satisfied for an accused person to raise the defence of diminished responsibility:
- The accused was suffering from an abnormality of mind.
- The abnormality of mind must have resulted from either of the following:
- A condition of arrested or retarded mental development;
- Any inherent causes (e.g. depression; or
- The result of a disease or injury.
- The abnormality of mind resulted in the substantial impairment of the accused’s mental responsibility for their acts.
The cause of the abnormality of mind – the second condition – is a fact that is largely determined by expert medical evidence, while the first and third conditions are facts that must be determined by the courts.
As these are cumulative conditions, all three of them must be met before an accused person can successfully raise the defence of diminished responsibility. For example, if the court finds that the accused had not been suffering from an abnormality of mind (i.e., the first condition), then it would not need to go on to deal with the other conditions.
In cases where the defence of diminished responsibility has been raised, the courts have tended to focus on the connection between the accused person’s abnormality of mind and his responsibility for the offence. In particular, the requirement of substantial impairment means that there must be “a real and material impairment of the accused’s mental state”.
Medical evidence is important in helping the courts determine the presence of such an impairment and the severity of it. However, the courts have stressed that it would be sufficient to show that the substantial impairment influenced the accused person’s actions. It is not necessary to show that the substantial impairment caused the offence to be committed.
The following cases are examples of how the courts have applied this approach in determining whether the defence of diminished responsibility applies:
Defence of diminished responsibility succeeded as accused’s major depressive disorder substantially impaired his ability to think rationally
In June 2021, an accused who had slashed his boss to death, and attacked two other bosses after he was fired, was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment for one charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, and another charge of voluntarily causing grievous hurt by a dangerous weapon.
In this case, the High Court noted that at the time when he had committed the offences, the accused was suffering from a major depressive disorder, which substantially impaired his ability to think of a more rational solution to dealing with the issue of him getting fired.
As a result, the accused responded and reacted in a violent manner by attacking his bosses with weapons to severely injure them.
Defence of diminished responsibility did not succeed as accused’s adjustment disorder did not impair his mental responsibility
In another case, a foreign worker who was sentenced to death in December 2020 for strangling his girlfriend claimed that she had humiliated him right before he killed her. The accused raised the defence of diminished responsibility by submitting that he had been suffering from an adjustment disorder – a stress-related mental health condition – at the time of committing the offence, which impaired his mental responsibility for the killing.
However, the High Court rejected the accused’s defence. Although psychiatric experts for both the prosecution and defence agreed that the accused was suffering from an adjustment disorder when he committed the offence, the High Court noted that the accused was able to continue working and performing well in his job and pursue recreational activities.
The court also found that his ability to make decisions and exercise self-control were not impaired. Accordingly, it found no impairment in his mental responsibility for his acts.
What Happens If an Accused is Able to Successfully Prove Diminished Responsibility?
The defence of diminished responsibility provides for a measure of criminal liability or accountability for accused persons who kill. However, it also recognises that it was their substantially impaired mental capacity that had led them to kill.
If an accused person successfully raises the defence of diminished responsibility, his criminal liability is reduced, and he will be convicted instead with the offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
In this case, where the accused had acted with an intention to cause death or of causing bodily injury that is likely to cause death, the accused will be sentenced to either life imprisonment and caning, or imprisonment for a term of up to 20 years, as well as a fine or caning.
Where there had been no intention to cause death, but the accused had caused death or bodily injury while knowing that the act was likely to cause death, the accused will be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of up to 15 years, a fine and/or caning.
However, an accused person who unsuccessfully raises the defence of diminished responsibility can be convicted of murder and then sentenced to either the death penalty, or life imprisonment and caning, depending on the seriousness of their acts.
Diminished responsibility is a partial defence to the offence of murder. As discussed above, a person accused of murder seeking to rely on this defence must be able to satisfy its requirements, else risk the defence being rejected and themselves being convicted of murder.
If you have been charged with murder and wish to raise the defence of diminished responsibility, it is best to consult a criminal lawyer for further advice. The offence of murder is a very serious crime that carries a severe penalty, and legal advice could mean the difference between you receiving a term of imprisonment or the death penalty.
- Your Right to a Lawyer After Being Arrested in Singapore
- What to Do If Your Loved One is Under Police Investigation
- How to Write a Letter of Representation to AGC in Singapore
- What is Entrapment and is It Legal in Singapore?
- What Happens When You Voluntarily Surrender to the Police
- Juvenile Crime: What If Your Child is Arrested in Singapore?
- Police Investigation Process for Crimes in Singapore (4 Steps)
- Arrest Warrant Issued Against You in Singapore: What to Do
- Police Arrest Procedure in Singapore
- Arrestable and Non-Arrestable Offences in Singapore
- What Should You Do If You Witness a Crime in Singapore?
- Can the Public Make a Citizen's Arrest in Singapore?
- What to Do If You’re Being Investigated for a Criminal Offence in Singapore
- "Right to Remain Silent" to Singapore Police: Does It Exist?
- Police Custody in Singapore: What You Should Know
- Search Warrant: The Issuance and Execution of It in Singapore
- Penalties for Lying to the Authorities in Singapore
- Can You Say No to a Lie Detector Test in Singapore? And Other FAQs
- Surrender of Passport to the Police and How to Get It Back
- Extradition: What If I Flee After Committing Crime in Singapore
- Making Objections at Trial in the Singapore Courts
- When is a Witness Testimony Unreliable in Singapore?
- Burden of Proof in Criminal and Civil Cases in Singapore
- Falsely Accused of a Crime in Singapore: Your Next Steps
- What is Acquittal & How Can One Be Acquitted in Singapore?
- Using the Defence of Diminished Responsibility in Singapore
- Death of a Party in a Legal Case in Singapore: What Happens?
- The "Unusually Convincing" Test in "He Said, She Said" Cases
- How to Adjourn or Postpone a Criminal Court Hearing
- TIC: Guide to Charges Taken Into Consideration in Singapore
- Can I Use the Defence of Intoxication in Singapore?
- When Can I Raise the Defence of Provocation in Singapore?
- Can I Represent Myself in a Criminal Court Case in Singapore and How?
- Claiming Trial as an Accused
- Pleading Guilty in Singapore: Consequences & Withdrawal of Plea
- The Defence of Unsound Mind in Singapore: What is It?
- Gag Orders in Singapore: Whose Identity Can be Protected?
- Mitigation Plea: How to Plead for Leniency in Court in Singapore
- Recidivism: What Happens If You Reoffend in Singapore?
- Guide to Filing a Criminal Appeal in Singapore
- Criminal Motion: What is It and How to File One in Singapore
- Guide to Filing a Criminal Revision in Singapore
- Presidential Clemency in Singapore
- Repatriation or Deportation from Singapore: How Does It Work?
- Criminal Records in Singapore
- Visiting a Loved One in Prison or On Death Row in Singapore
- Getting Parole (Early Prison Release) in Singapore
- Fined for an Offence: What to Do If I Can't Afford to Pay Them?
- How Long Is Life Imprisonment in Singapore? And Other FAQs
- Corrective Training and Its Consequences in Singapore
- Consequences of Receiving a Stern Warning in Singapore
- Probation: Eligibility and Whether It Leaves a Criminal Record
- How Can Adult Offenders Get Probation in Singapore?
- Reformative Training in Singapore: When Will It be Ordered?
- Are You Eligible for a Mandatory Treatment Order (MTO)?
- Caning in Singapore: Judicial, School & Parental Corporal Punishment
- 7 Detention Orders in Singapore: When Will They be Ordered?
- Day Reporting Order: Eligibility and Offender's Obligations
- Ragging and Bullying: Their Penalties and What Victims Can Do
- Laws Protecting Informers/Whistleblowers in Singapore
- Counterfeit Medicine/Health Products: Redress for Victims in Singapore
- Breach of Protection Orders: What Can Victims Do?
- Using Your Right to Self-Defence When Attacked in Singapore
- Compensation for Crime Victims in Singapore: How to Obtain
- Rape Laws in Singapore and How Offenders Can Be Punished
- Sexual Misconduct in Singapore: Offences and What Victims Can Do
- Falsely Accused of Rape in Singapore: What to Do
- Incest and Family Sexual Abuse: Penalties and Victim Protection
- How are Sexual Offenders with Special Needs Penalised?
- Cybersexual Crimes in Singapore and Their Penalties
- Legal Age for Sex in Singapore and Common Sexual Offences
- Consent in Sexual Offences in Singapore and What Victims Can Do
- Accused of Molest: Outrage of Modesty in Singapore
- What Can Victims of Sexual Harassment in Singapore Do?
- What is the Law on Sexting in Singapore?
- Revenge Porn: What If Your Nudes are Leaked in Singapore?
- Crime of Voyeurism in Singapore (Penalties and Defences)
- Date Rape: What to Do If Your Drink Has Been Unlawfully Spiked?
- STDs: Can I Go to the Police If a Partner Infected Me in Singapore?
- Alcohol Breathalyser Test in Singapore: Can You Refuse it?
- Singapore's Legal Smoking Age & Common Smoking Offences
- Is Vaping Illegal in Singapore?
- Legal Drinking Age and Drinking-Related Laws in Singapore
- Is Watching, Downloading or Filming Porn Illegal in Singapore?
- Child Pornography in Singapore: Offences and Penalties
- Laws on Procuring Sex Workers & Sexual Services in Singapore
- Singapore's Drug Laws: Possession, Consumption and Trafficking
- Gambling Legally (at Home, in Public or Online) in Singapore
- The Offence of Human Trafficking in Singapore and Its Penalties
- Penalties for Committing Theft in Singapore
- Committing Robbery in Singapore: What are the Penalties?
- Penalties for Dishonest Misappropriation of Property in Singapore
- Vandalism Laws: Penalties for Damaging Property in Singapore
- Criminal Trespass in Singapore: What Happens If You’re Caught?
- Penalties for Littering and Killer Litter Offences in Singapore
- What is a POFMA Correction Direction and How to Appeal
- Penalties for Cheating/Scamming and What Victims Can Do
- Penalties for Impersonating Someone and Victim Redress
- Singapore Fake News Laws: Guide to POFMA (Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act)
- Laws and Penalties for Doxxing in Singapore (With Examples)
- Tax Evasion in Singapore: Penalties and Examples
- Criminal Breach of Trust (CBT) in Singapore: What is It?
- All You Need to Know About Corruption in Singapore
- Anti-Money Laundering Laws and You
- 5 Things You Need to Know about Insider Trading
- Dishonest Assistance and Knowing Receipt: The Case of David Rasif
- Charged with a Traffic Offence in Singapore: What to Do
- DUI: Here are the Penalties for Drink-Driving in Singapore
- What Happens If You’re Caught Speeding in Singapore?
- Road Rage: What is It and How are Offenders Sentenced in Singapore
- Penalties for Dangerous Driving for Singapore Drivers
- Fatal Traffic Accidents: Are Drivers Always Punished?
- Guide to E-Scooter and PMD Laws for Singapore Riders
- Is it Legal for Drivers to Carpool in Singapore?
- Radicalisation and Terror Attack-Related Penalties in Singapore
- Causing a Public Nuisance in Singapore: What are the Penalties?
- Causing Public Alarm in Singapore: Examples & Penalties
- Public Assemblies and Processions in Singapore
- Misbehaving in Public: 5 Things You Need to Know
- Racial Enmity: Sections 298 and 298A Penal Code Explained
- Religious Cults in Singapore: Are they Illegal? Penalties & More
- Penalties for Financing Terrorist Operations in Singapore
- Penalties for Abetting Minors or Committing Crimes Against Them
- Here are the Penalties for Committing Forgery in Singapore
- Arson and Fire-Related Offences and Their Penalties in Singapore
- Offences Against the Dead and What Family Members Can Do
- Laws on Prohibited, Replica and Self-Defence Weapons
- Penalties for Attempting to Commit a Crime in Singapore
- Penalties for Assaulting a Person in Singapore
- Expats Charged With Offences in Singapore: What to Expect
- What are the Penalties for Hiring Phantom Workers in Singapore?
- What Are Ponzi Schemes? Are They Illegal in Singapore?
- Modification of Cars, Motorcycles, Etc: Is It Legal in Singapore?
- Penalties for Illegal Immigration and Overstaying in Singapore
- Criminal Intimidation: Penalties for Making Threats in Singapore