Legal Defences in Criminal Law: Special Exceptions

Last updated on May 24, 2024

lawyer holding up a file in court

When an accused person is charged with committing a crime, the prosecution bears the legal burden of proving the elements of the charged offence beyond reasonable doubt. In other words, the prosecution has to prove that the accused person had in fact committed the crime.

However, in certain cases, the accused person may seek to rely on a defence, either to dispute the elements of the offence or as a justification/excuse for committing the offence in question. In such cases, the accused person bears the legal burden of proving the defence on the balance of probabilities. Nevertheless, whether and what types of legal defences would apply depend on various factors.

To shed light on the above, this article will cover the following topics:

What is a Criminal Defence?

Broadly speaking, criminal defences refer to any claims raised by accused persons seeking to be acquitted of the charges levied (i.e. to be found not guilty of those criminal charges), to have their existing charges reduced to ones of lesser severity, or to be acquitted on the grounds of the defence. The Penal Code contains some of these defences, which can be classified into the following two categories:

  1. General Exceptions: These defences are contained in Part IV of the Penal Code and apply not only to offences within the Penal Code, but also to offences outside the Code (e.g. offences under the Protection from Harassment Act or under the Companies Act), unless the statute specifically excludes it. Successfully raising the defences that come under the General Exceptions can result in a complete acquittal for accused persons.
  2. Special Exceptions: These defences are found in section 300 of the Penal Code and apply only to the offence of murder. Even if successfully invoked, the defences that come under the Special Exceptions only work as a partial defence, leading to a reduction of the charge of murder to one of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. You can refer to our other article for a brief overview of the differences between murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder, which also covers the three ways in which one can be found guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. One key distinction is that the maximum punishment if one is convicted of murder is the death penalty, whereas culpable homicide attracts an imprisonment term (life imprisonment, imprisonment of up to 20 years, or imprisonment of up to 15 years, depending on which of the 3 ways one is found guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder), alongside possible caning and a fine.

This article only covers the “special exceptions” legal defences. Please refer to our other article for information on the “general exceptions” legal defences.

Do note that it is not always easy to raise a criminal defence, as there are a number of requirements/conditions that must be met as prescribed by the law, which will be discussed below. Furthermore, as mentioned in the introduction, the accused person bears the legal burden of proving the defence on a balance of probabilities. This differs from many other jurisdictions, where the accused person only bears the evidentiary burden of producing some evidence to support the defence, whereupon the prosecution bears the legal burden of disproving the defence beyond a reasonable doubt. As such, it has been observed that criminal defences are less frequently raised in practice in Singapore, compared to these other jurisdictions.

What are the Types of Legal Defences Under the Category of “Special Exceptions”?

Grave and sudden provocation

Provocation is a partial defence to murder and has the effect of reducing the charge from murder to one of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

In 2016, a woman stabbed her husband in the chest and killed him. She was originally charged with murder. However, her charge was reduced to one of causing grievous hurt on account of her successfully raising the defence of grave and sudden provocation. It was revealed that on the day of the incident, her husband, suspecting her of cheating on him, had attacked her – choking and hitting her until she confessed to the affair. While armed with a knife, he then threatened to kill her and their 14-month-old daughter before taking his own life. She managed to get a knife from the kitchen for her protection, but he continued advancing towards her. It was only at this point that she lost her self-control and stabbed him, thereby causing his death.

The elements to be proven for the defence of provocation to succeed are as follows:

  1. That the accused person had been deprived of his self-control by the provocation. The accused’s behaviour during the time of the offence is of great evidential value. The loss of self-control must be sudden and temporary, causing the accused person to be so subject to passion as to make him lose control over his mind. In the example above, the provocative circumstances leading up to the stabbing, including the sustained and violent abuse by the accused person’s husband, coupled with his threats against her and their daughter, led to her sudden and temporary loss of self-control.
  2. The provocation must have been “grave and sudden”. This involves the use of an objective “reasonable man” test. Under this test, the main consideration is whether an ordinary person of the same gender and age as the accused person and sharing his characteristics, if placed in the same situation as him, would have been so provoked as to lose his self-control. Referring to the above example, the provocation was grave and sudden, especially since the husband was preventing her from leaving the apartment and threatening to harm her and their daughter.

One situation under which the defence of provocation is expressly disallowed is where the accused person had voluntarily sought or provoked the provocation for the purpose of using it as an excuse for killing or doing harm to the other person.

For instance, the accused person gets into a disagreement with another person and keeps tailing and pestering the latter. Fed up, the other person stops, turns around, and swings a weapon at the accused person (i.e. the provocation). The accused person takes out a weapon of his own and causes death to the other person. As the accused person had voluntarily sought the provocation, he cannot rely on the other person’s provocation as an excuse for causing his death.

Sudden fight

The defence of sudden fight is a special exception to murder. The scenario envisioned by the defence is where a killing occurred during an unexpected fight between the accused person and the victim.

In 2014, a brothel owner was charged with murder after he had bludgeoned a pimp with a dumbbell rod, over S$6,500 that he believed the latter had stolen from his pocket. He tried raising the defence of sudden fight, but this was rejected, as the court found that the third element (explained below) was not satisfied. The accused person had undue advantage over the victim, given that he was armed with a weapon, and had an advantage over him in his physique.

Accused persons seeking to raise the defence of sudden fight must prove the following elements:

  1. That they caused the victim’s death in a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel. The emphasis is very clearly on the requirement of suddenness, which in turn requires there to have been a very short interval between the quarrel and the fight. The longer the interval, the more unlikely that the defence will be applicable.
  2. The killing must not have been pre-meditated, i.e. the killing must not have been planned. In another case, the accused person had armed himself for a robbery, and carried out a relentless and cruel stabbing frenzy with the intention of silencing the victims. The court found that the defence of sudden fight was unavailable to him.
  3. The accused person must not have taken undue advantage of the victim. In other words, the parties to the fight must have been on more or less equal footing. For example, if the accused person had commenced the fight with a weapon against an unarmed victim and had killed him with it, then the accused person would likely be regarded as taking undue advantage, and the defence of sudden fight would accordingly not succeed. Apart from being armed with a weapon, the accused person’s relative physique as compared to the victim is also another point that will be taken into consideration.
  4. The accused person must not have acted in a cruel or unusual manner when causing death in the fight.

Broadly speaking, the defence of consent operates in this way: if a deceased person above the age of 18 years is killed with his own consent, then the accused person’s charge will be reduced from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

An illustration of this is as follows: A and Z are both above 18 years of age. The pair decide to commit suicide together by drinking poison. With Z’s consent, A pours poison down Z’s throat, and Z dies. Thereafter, A changes his mind and decides not to drink the same poison. As A has caused Z’s death, albeit with Z’s consent, A has committed culpable homicide not amounting to murder and not murder.

The elements to be proven in order to invoke the partial defence of consent are:

  1. The victim must be above 18 years of age.
  2. The victim must have unequivocally given his consent to being killed, with full knowledge of the identity of the person who is to kill them and the method of killing.

Diminished responsibility

The defence of diminished responsibility is closely related to that of unsoundness of mind above, as in both scenarios, the accused persons are seeking to reduce their criminal responsibility on account of a mental disorder. However, there are two key differences between the two defences:

  1. Unsoundness of mind is a general exception, and hence applies to all offences. On the other hand, the defence of diminished responsibility is a special exception, and hence only applies to murder and certain drug-related offences.
  2. Unsoundness of mind results in an acquittal, albeit a qualified one (as described above). On the other hand, diminished responsibility is only a partial defence, and reduces the charge from one of murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Thus, even if the defence of diminished responsibility is successfully raised, the accused person will still be convicted and sentenced accordingly.

In 2020, an accused person planned to kill his girlfriend, intending to end his life thereafter, because he suspected that she was cheating on him, and because he was facing financial troubles at work. He splashed acid on her face while she slept, slashed her arms with a knife and left her to bleed on their bed. He then took sleeping pills and fell asleep next to her. Both survived, though the victim suffered considerable injuries and trauma. He subsequently tried to rely on the defence of diminished responsibility and succeeded in doing so. The court was persuaded by the assessment of an Institute of Mental Health psychiatrist that the accused person had major depression at the time of the attack that impaired his judgement and self-control and contributed to his offending. His charge was reduced from attempted murder to attempting to commit culpable homicide and he was jailed for 4 years.

Another example where the defence of diminished responsibility was raised, albeit unsuccessfully, was in 2023 when a domestic helper was found guilty of murder for stabbing her employer’s elderly mother-in-law to death. The victim had threatened to send the accused person back to her agent, and the accused person attacked and stabbed her to death, before breaking a lock on a cupboard in the master bedroom and retrieving her belongings. She washed the knife and changed her clothes before leaving the flat. Upon her subsequent arrest, she fabricated stories of the victim being stabbed by two fictitious men. The accused person argued that she suffered from mixed anxiety and depressive reaction or an adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood at the time of the killing. However, the court rejected this, as her actions after the stabbing, including her vivid description of the stabbing, were inconsistent with her claim that she did not know what she was doing.

To invoke the defence of diminished responsibility, accused persons must prove the following elements:

  1. At the time of the killing, they were suffering from an abnormality of mind. The term “abnormality of mind” is not defined but has been accepted to refer to a state of mind so different from that of an ordinary human being that a reasonable man would term it abnormal. As can be seen from the example above, major depression, backed by the assessment of a psychiatrist, can be sufficient to satisfy this element.
  2. The abnormality of mind arose from a condition of arrested or retarded development of mind, or from any inherent cause, or was induced by disease or injury. To fit the causes of the abnormality of mind into one of the above conditions, evidence from a medical expert often forms a crucial part of the accused person’s case.
  3. The abnormality of mind substantially impaired their capacity to know the nature of the act or that it was wrong, or to control their conduct. This was the weakness in the domestic helper’s defence, as the circumstances were inconsistent with her being unable to know the nature of the act or that it was wrong, or to control their conduct.

– –

In conclusion, there are many defences available to accused persons. However, whether the defences are appropriate for the circumstances will ultimately depend on the particular offence that accused persons have been charged with, as well as whether the elements of the defences can be satisfied on the face of the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime.

If you or your loved ones have been charged with committing a criminal offence, and wish to consider your legal options, in particular, whether and which legal defences to raise, you are strongly encouraged to seek further legal advice from a criminal defence lawyer. A criminal defence lawyer will be able to advise you on which defences are available and applicable in your case, as well as represent you in the matter if necessary.

Arrest and Investigation
  1. Singapore’s Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: What Does It Mean?
  2. What is the Appropriate Adult Scheme in Singapore?
  3. Stopped by the Singapore Police For Spot Checks, Etc: What to Do
  4. Tasers, Batons, Shields & Firearms: When Do the Police Use Them?
  5. Seized Assets in Money Laundering Investigations: What Happens To Them?
  6. Juvenile Crime: What If Your Child is Arrested in Singapore?
  7. What Happens When You Voluntarily Surrender to the Police
  8. What is Entrapment and is It Legal in Singapore?
  9. How to Write a Letter of Representation to AGC in Singapore
  10. What to Do If Your Loved One is Under Police Investigation
  11. Your Right to a Lawyer After Being Arrested in Singapore
  12. Police Investigation Process for Crimes in Singapore (4 Steps)
  13. Arrest Warrant Issued Against You in Singapore: What to Do
  14. Police Arrest Procedure in Singapore
  15. Arrestable and Non-Arrestable Offences in Singapore
  16. What Should You Do If You Witness a Crime in Singapore?
  17. Can the Public Make a Citizen's Arrest in Singapore?
  18. What to Do If You’re Being Investigated for a Criminal Offence in Singapore
  19. "Right to Remain Silent" to Singapore Police: Does It Exist?
  20. Police Custody in Singapore: What You Should Know
  21. Search Warrant: The Issuance and Execution of It in Singapore
  22. Penalties for Lying to the Authorities in Singapore
  23. Can You Say No to a Lie Detector Test in Singapore? And Other FAQs
  24. Surrender of Passport to the Police and How to Get It Back
  25. Extradition: What If I Flee After Committing Crime in Singapore
Bail
  1. The Essential Guide to Bail and Personal Bonds in Singapore
Prosecution
  1. What is Private Prosecution?
  2. Magistrate’s Complaints, Private Summons and Private Prosecutions in Singapore
  3. Prosecutorial Discretion in Singapore
  4. Composition Offers and Fines for Criminal Offences in Singapore
  5. Plea Bargaining in Singapore: All You Need to Know
During Criminal Proceedings
  1. Using the Defence of Diminished Responsibility in Singapore
  2. Aggravating Factors in a Criminal Case
  3. Legal Defences in Criminal Law: Special Exceptions
  4. Giving False vs. Wrong Evidence: What’s the Difference?
  5. Writing Character References For Court: What’s Their Purpose?
  6. When Can I Raise the Defence of Provocation in Singapore?
  7. Can I Use the Defence of Intoxication in Singapore?
  8. TIC: Guide to Charges Taken Into Consideration in Singapore
  9. How to Adjourn or Postpone a Criminal Court Hearing
  10. The "Unusually Convincing" Test in "He Said, She Said" Cases
  11. Death of a Party in a Legal Case in Singapore: What Happens?
  12. What is Acquittal & How Can One Be Acquitted in Singapore?
  13. Falsely Accused of a Crime in Singapore: Your Next Steps
  14. Burden of Proof in Criminal and Civil Cases in Singapore
  15. When is a Witness Testimony Unreliable in Singapore?
  16. Legal Defences in Criminal Law: General Exceptions
  17. Making Objections at Trial in the Singapore Courts
  18. Can I Represent Myself in a Criminal Court Case in Singapore and How?
  19. Claiming Trial as an Accused
  20. Pleading Guilty in Singapore: Consequences & Withdrawal of Plea
  21. The Defence of Unsound Mind in Singapore: What is It?
  22. Gag Orders in Singapore: Whose Identity Can be Protected?
  23. Mitigation Plea: How to Plead for Leniency in Court in Singapore
After Criminal Proceedings
  1. Recidivism: What Happens If You Reoffend in Singapore?
  2. Guide to Filing a Criminal Appeal in Singapore
  3. Criminal Motion: What is It and How to File One in Singapore
  4. Guide to Filing a Criminal Revision in Singapore
  5. Presidential Clemency in Singapore
  6. Repatriation or Deportation from Singapore: How Does It Work?
  7. Criminal Records in Singapore
  8. Visiting a Loved One in Prison or On Death Row in Singapore
  9. Getting Parole (Early Prison Release) in Singapore
Types of Sentences After Committing an Offence
  1. Fined for an Offence: What to Do If I Can't Afford to Pay Them?
  2. How Long Is Life Imprisonment in Singapore? And Other FAQs
  3. Corrective Training and Its Consequences in Singapore
  4. Consequences of Receiving a Stern Warning in Singapore
  5. Probation: Eligibility and Whether It Leaves a Criminal Record
  6. How Can Adult Offenders Get Probation in Singapore?
  7. Reformative Training in Singapore: When Will It be Ordered?
  8. Are You Eligible for a Mandatory Treatment Order (MTO)?
  9. Caning in Singapore: Judicial, School & Parental Corporal Punishment
  10. 7 Detention Orders in Singapore: When Will They be Ordered?
  11. Day Reporting Order: Eligibility and Offender's Obligations
Being a Victim
  1. Ragging and Bullying: Their Penalties and What Victims Can Do
  2. Laws Protecting Informers/Whistleblowers in Singapore
  3. Counterfeit Medicine/Health Products: Redress for Victims in Singapore
  4. Breach of Protection Orders: What Can Victims Do?
  5. Using Your Right to Self-Defence When Attacked in Singapore
  6. Compensation for Crime Victims in Singapore: How to Obtain
Offences Against the Human Body
  1. Voluntarily Causing Hurt Penalties in Singapore (Non-Arrestable)
  2. Murder vs Culpable Homicide in Singapore (and Penalties)
  3. Is Suicide Illegal in Singapore? Will I Be Punished for Trying?
  4. Kidnapping Scam: Penalties & Responding to a ‘Kidnap Call/Text'
Sexual Offences
  1. How are Sexual Offenders with Special Needs Penalised?
  2. BDSM Gone Wrong: Potential Legal Issues with Sexual Kink Practices
  3. The Offence of Attempted Rape in Singapore: Law & Penalties
  4. Cybersexual Crimes in Singapore and Their Penalties
  5. Incest and Family Sexual Abuse: Penalties and Victim Protection
  6. Falsely Accused of Rape in Singapore: What to Do
  7. Sexual Misconduct in Singapore: Offences and What Victims Can Do
  8. Rape Laws in Singapore and How Offenders Can Be Punished
  9. Legal Age for Sex in Singapore and Common Sexual Offences
  10. Consent in Sexual Offences in Singapore and What Victims Can Do
  11. Accused of Molest: Outrage of Modesty in Singapore
  12. What Can Victims of Sexual Harassment in Singapore Do?
  13. What is the Law on Sexting in Singapore?
  14. Revenge Porn: What If Your Nudes are Leaked in Singapore?
  15. Crime of Voyeurism in Singapore (Penalties and Defences)
  16. Date Rape: What to Do If Your Drink Has Been Unlawfully Spiked?
  17. STDs: Can I Go to the Police If a Partner Infected Me in Singapore?
Vice-Related Offences
  1. Alcohol Breathalyser Test in Singapore: Can You Refuse it?
  2. Are Sex Toys and Sex Dolls Legal in Singapore?
  3. Singapore's Legal Smoking Age & Common Smoking Offences
  4. Is Vaping Illegal in Singapore?
  5. Legal Drinking Age and Drinking-Related Laws in Singapore
  6. Is Watching, Downloading or Filming Porn Illegal in Singapore?
  7. Child Pornography in Singapore: Offences and Penalties
  8. Laws on Procuring Sex Workers & Sexual Services in Singapore
  9. Singapore's Drug Laws: Possession, Consumption and Trafficking
  10. Gambling Legally (at Home, in Public or Online) in Singapore
  11. The Offence of Human Trafficking in Singapore and Its Penalties
Property Offences
  1. What is a Protected Area and Place in Singapore?
  2. Penalties For Buying Stolen Goods in Singapore
  3. Penalties for Committing Theft in Singapore
  4. Committing Robbery in Singapore: What are the Penalties?
  5. Penalties for Dishonest Misappropriation of Property in Singapore
  6. Vandalism Laws: Penalties for Damaging Property in Singapore
  7. Criminal Trespass in Singapore: What Happens If You’re Caught?
  8. Penalties for Littering Offences in Singapore
Cybercrime
  1. What is a POFMA Correction Direction and How to Appeal
  2. Penalties for Cheating/Scamming and What Victims Can Do
  3. Penalties for Impersonating Someone and Victim Redress
  4. Singapore Fake News Laws: Guide to POFMA (Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act)
  5. Laws and Penalties for Doxxing in Singapore (With Examples)
White-Collar Crimes
  1. Tax Evasion in Singapore: Penalties and Examples
  2. Criminal Breach of Trust (CBT) in Singapore: What is It?
  3. All You Need to Know About Corruption in Singapore
  4. A Guide to Singapore’s Anti-Money Laundering Laws
  5. 5 Things You Need to Know about Insider Trading
  6. Dishonest Assistance and Knowing Receipt: The Case of David Rasif
Road Offences
  1. Charged with a Traffic Offence in Singapore: What to Do
  2. DUI: Here are the Penalties for Drink-Driving in Singapore
  3. What Happens If You’re Caught Speeding in Singapore?
  4. Road Rage: What is It and How are Offenders Sentenced in Singapore
  5. Penalties for Dangerous Driving for Singapore Drivers
  6. Fatal Traffic Accidents: Are Drivers Always Punished?
  7. Guide to E-Scooter and PMD Laws for Singapore Riders
  8. Is it Legal for Drivers to Carpool in Singapore?
Animal-Related Offences
  1. Taxidermy of Animals in Singapore: Is It Legal?
  2. Legal and Illegal Pets in Singapore (HDB/Private Property)
  3. Is It Illegal to Feed Stray Animals in Singapore?
  4. Animal Abuse in Singapore: Offences, Penalties & How to Report Abuse
Offences Relating to Public Peace and Good Order
  1. Radicalisation and Terror Attack-Related Penalties in Singapore
  2. Causing a Public Nuisance in Singapore: What are the Penalties?
  3. Causing Public Alarm in Singapore: Examples & Penalties
  4. Public Assemblies and Processions in Singapore
  5. Misbehaving in Public: 5 Things You Need to Know
  6. Racial Enmity: Sections 298 and 298A Penal Code Explained
  7. Religious Cults in Singapore: Are they Illegal? Penalties & More
  8. Penalties for Financing Terrorist Operations in Singapore
Gang and Riot-related Offences
  1. Penalties for Unlawful Assembly and Rioting in Singapore
  2. Is Joining a Gang Illegal in Singapore?: Being Recruited and Penalties
  3. Organised Crimes: Penalties/Orders Syndicates Face in Singapore
Marriage-Related Offences
  1. Bigamy: Is It Legal to Marry a Married Person in Singapore?
  2. Marriage Offences in Singapore Involving Minors, Same-Sex, Etc.
  3. What are Sham Marriages and Are They Illegal in Singapore?
Certificate of Clearance
  1. How Do You Apply for a Certificate of Clearance in Singapore?
Other Criminal Offences
  1. Penalties for Abetting Minors or Committing Crimes Against Them
  2. Misusing the Singapore Flag and Other National Symbols
  3. What are the Penalties for Committing Forgery in Singapore?
  4. Arson and Fire-Related Offences and Their Penalties in Singapore
  5. Offences Against the Dead and What Family Members Can Do
  6. Laws on Prohibited, Replica and Self-Defence Weapons
  7. Laws to Tackle High-Rise Littering in Singapore
  8. Penalties for Attempting to Commit a Crime in Singapore
  9. Penalties for Assaulting a Person in Singapore
  10. Is Dining & Dashing Illegal in Singapore?
  11. Expats Charged With Offences in Singapore: What to Expect
  12. What are the Penalties for Hiring Phantom Workers in Singapore?
  13. What Are Ponzi Schemes? Are They Illegal in Singapore?
  14. Modification of Cars, Motorcycles, Etc: Is It Legal in Singapore?
  15. Penalties for Illegal Immigration and Overstaying in Singapore
  16. Criminal Intimidation: Penalties for Making Threats in Singapore