Insolvency: Claw-back of Assets from Unfair Preference and Undervalue Transactions
One of the most common reasons a company is wound up is because it is unable to pay its debts and it would not be commercially viable to carry on the business. In this scenario, liquidators will be appointed to distribute the company’s remaining assets to its creditors. Most of the time, the company’s remaining assets are insufficient and the liquidator may want to increase it. One way to do so is to claw back assets that have been previously transferred in transactions:
- Where unfair or undue preference was given; or
- At an undervalue.
This article will explain what constitutes unfair preference and undervalue transactions.
1. Clawing Back Assets from Unfair Preference Transactions
To make out a case for unfair preference, the liquidator must show 4 elements.
- The preferred party (the beneficiary of the transaction) is a creditor or guarantor for any of the company’s debts or liabilities;
- The company was insolvent (or became insolvent as a consequence of the transaction) at the time of giving the preference;
- The company does anything which puts the preferred party in a better position than the preferred party would have been had the transaction not be entered in the event of the company’s liquidation; and
- The company was influenced in deciding to enter the transaction by a desire to prefer the preferred party.
The first element is made out fairly easily. Such a relationship may be established by contracts.
The second element may be satisfied by applying either the cash flow or balance sheet test. The cash flow test involves showing that the company was unable to pay its debts as they fall due. However, the High Court noted in Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd v Tong Tien See that a temporal lack of liquidity does not equate to insolvency. The balance sheet test involves looking at whether the net value of assets is less than the net liabilities (including contingent and prospective liabilities).
The third element is self-explanatory. As long as the preferred party received more of the company’s assets than he would have received had the assets been distributed by the liquidator, he has been put in a better position.
The fourth element may be difficult to prove but the Bankruptcy Act has provided a statutory presumption of a desire to prefer. As long as the preferred party is an associate of the company, the company is presumed to have been influenced by a desire to prefer. The definition of associates of the insolvent company is wide. They include employees, directors, officers and another company which is under the control of the insolvent company by shareholding with at least one third voting powers in a general meeting.
If the preferred party is not an associate, the Court of Appeal in DBS v Tam Chee Chong has provided some guidelines. The Court emphasised that one must look at the subjective desire of the insolvent company to prefer at the point of payment. It is sufficient that the desire to prefer is one of the factors influencing the decision of the insolvent company to enter the transaction. In other words, the desire to prefer need not be a dominant intention. This desire to prefer may be negated by overwhelming but proper commercial pressure. The genuineness of commercial pressure depends on the facts of each case.
Last, the relevant time period during which assets may be clawed back is two years from the date of the winding up application for associates and six months for unrelated parties.
2. Clawing Back Assets from Undervalue Transactions
To determine if a transaction is at an undervalue (within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Act), the liquidator must show 2 elements.
- Any one of the following 2 situations:
- The company makes a gift to the recipient; or
- The company enters into a transaction where the value of consideration received is significantly less than the value of the consideration provided; and
- The company was or became insolvent as a result of that transaction.
The first element is fairly easy to make out. It may be evidenced by contracts. In the second situation, one simply needs to look at the market value of the consideration received and the value of what was actually received.
The second element may be difficult to prove but the Bankruptcy Act has provided a statutory presumption of insolvency. As long as the transaction is with an associate, the transaction is presumed to be at an undervalue. The definition of ‘associates’ is the same as that for unfair preference. The Court of Appeal in Show Theatres Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Shaw Theatres Pte Ltd rejected numerous creative attempts to narrowly construe the meaning of “associates”. The Court held that if two companies had a common director, they are associates.
Last, the relevant time period during which assets may be clawed back is five years from the date of the winding up application regardless of whether the undervalue transaction was with an associate or not.
There might be certain transactions which is both at an undervalue and where unfair preference was given. In this scenario, the relevant time period during which assets may be clawed back is five years from the date of the winding up application regardless of whether the undervalue transaction was with an associate or not.
- Annual General Meetings (AGMs) in Singapore: What are They?
- Anti-Money Laundering Regulations and Your Business: What You Need to Know
- Price-Fixing, Bid-Rigging and Other Anti-Competitive Practices to Avoid
- The Business Owner’s Guide to Dividend Payments in Singapore
- Company Audits in Singapore: Requirements and Exemptions
- How to Transfer Shares in a Singapore Private Company: The Essential Guide
- How to Hold an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) in Singapore
- How to Issue Shares in a Singapore Private Company
- How to Reduce the Share Capital of Your Singapore Company
- How Businesses Can Legally Conduct Lucky Draws in Singapore
- Dormant Companies and Their Filing Obligations in Singapore
- How to Hold a Board Meeting in Singapore
- Essential Regulatory Compliance Guide for Singapore Companies
- Finding a Suitable Corporate Secretarial Firm in Singapore
- Oppression of Minority Shareholders
- Process Agents in Singapore
- Company Constitution in Singapore: What It is and How to Draft One
- How to Set Up a Register of Controllers
- How to Set Up a Register of Nominee Directors
- Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): Does Your Business Need One?
- Minutes of Company Meeting in Singapore: How to Record
- Guide to Filing Financial Statements for Singapore Business Owners
- Company Resolutions: What are They?
- Board Resolutions in Singapore
- Company Memorandum and Articles of Association
- Filing Annual Returns For Your Business
- Shadow Directors: Who are They and What Duties Do They Owe to the Company?
- Director's Remuneration: When Can Company Directors be Remunerated For Their Services?
- How to Remove a Director from a Company in Singapore
- Appointing Company Directors in Singapore: Eligibility, Process etc.
- Company Loans to Directors/Shareholders (& Vice Versa) in Singapore
- Share Transmission: What Happens If a Shareholder Dies in Singapore?
- Business Will: How to Pass on Your Business to Your Successors in Singapore
- Shareholder Rights in Singapore Private Companies
- Removal and Resignation of Company Auditor in Singapore
- What Responsibilities Do Company Shareholders Have in Singapore?
- Creating and Registering Charges in Singapore: Guide for Companies
- How to Commence a Derivative Action on Behalf of a Company in Singapore
- Appointing a Company Secretary: Roles and Responsibilities
- Directors' Duties in Singapore
- Essential PDPA Compliance Guide for Singapore Businesses
- Cloud Storage of Personal Data: Your Business’ Data Protection Obligations
- How Can Companies Dispose of Documents Containing Personal Data?
- Here's a 7-Step Plan for Companies to Prevent Unauthorised Disclosure When Processing and Sending Personal Data
- Appointing a Data Protection Officer For Your Business: All You Need to Know
- Summary: Your Organisation's 9 Main Obligations under the Personal Data Protection Act
- Check the Do-Not-Call Registry Before Marketing to Singapore Phone Numbers
- GDPR Compliance in Singapore: Is it Required and How to Comply
- Is It Legal for Businesses to Ask for Your NRIC in Singapore?
- PDPA Consent Requirements: How Can Your Business Comply?
- Legal Options If Employees Breach Confidentiality in Singapore
- Insolvency: Claw-back of Assets from Unfair Preference and Undervalue Transactions
- Striking Off a Company
- What Should a Creditor Do When a Company Becomes Insolvent?
- Dissolution of partnerships in Singapore
- Validation of Payments Made by Companies Being Wound Up
- Can a Company that Struck Itself Off the Register Later Apply to Restore Itself?
- Are You Closing Your Singapore Business? Have You Settled All of the Following?
- How to File a Proof of Debt against a Company in Liquidation
- Winding Up a Company