About
As former District Judge in the Family Justice Courts, Clement is well regarded and has decided cases across a wide spectrum of matrimonial matters. For more information on his specific expertise, please see below the list of Judgments Clement has written in various areas of Family Law.
As a former Deputy Public Prosecutor with the Attorney General’s Chambers, Clement is also very experienced with the criminal justice system and has familiarity with handling criminal matters. A list of his reported cases are also set out in the section below.
If you require advice with any of these issues, do get in touch for a consultation.
Reviews (31)
Media & Publications
As a District Judge, I had published the following Judgements on Family Law:
a) On child maintenance – VNG v VNH [2020] SGFC 100
b) On child maintenance variation – VSP v VSQ [2021] SGFC 71
c) On the welfare of children – VLI v VLJ [2021] SGFC 51 and VLI v VLJ [2021] SGFC 112
d) On the relocation of children – UKS vs UKR [2021] SGFC 103
e) On the custody and care and control of children – WBD v WBC [2022] SGFC 23
f) On switching care and control of children – WEJ v WEI [2022] SGFC 51
g) On divorce and division of matrimonial assets – VWO v VWP [2021] SGFC 108
h) On accounting and valuation of matrimonial assets – VZD v VZE [2022] SGFC 1
i) On family violence and Personal Protection Orders (PPO) – VYV v VYW [2022] SGFC 02
j) On the payment of costs by a legally aided person – WEJ v WEI [2022] SGFC 73
As a Deputy Public Prosecutor, I was the Prosecutor in the following reported criminal cases:
Drug offences
a) LT1 consumption – PP v Nur Ellesha Shahidah [2016] SGDC 11
b) LT2 consumption – PP v Noor Amran Bin Mohd Ismail [2015] SGDC 351
c) Capital drug trafficking – PP v Gobi a/l Avedian [2017] SGHC 145
d) Drug consumption and trafficking – PP v Mohamad Shahli Bin Musa [2016] SGDC 313
Violence offences
e) Voluntarily causing hurt – PP v Md Abu Taher Md Shahbuddin & Ors [2015] SGDC 271
f) Voluntarily causing hurt with deadly weapon – PP v Vicknesh s/o Kuttaiyan [2015] SGDC 187
g) Causing grievous hurt by negligent act – PP v Koh Saw Khim [2015] SGMC 38
h) Robbery – PP v Mohammed Ridzuan Bin Hasan [2014] SGDC 247
Unlicensed moneylending
i) Harassing debtors – PP v Poh Chee How [2015] SGDC 330
Bail matters
j) Bail forfeiture – PP v Kaliamah d/o Kolanday [2017] SGDC 88
Services & Fees
Fees
Competitive rates; happy to give a short preliminary consultation for no charge.
I would like to express my sincere appreciation to Mr Clement Yong for the excellent legal service and support he provided to both my father and me in our criminal law matters.
From the very beginning, Clement conducted himself with a high level of professionalism, patience, and dedication. He took the time to understand our situation carefully, explained the legal matters to us clearly, and guided us through what was understandably a stressful and difficult period.
What I particularly appreciated was his responsiveness and willingness to address our concerns. He was approachable, attentive, and made sure that we understood the relevant legal issues and the options available to us. His calm and professional manner gave both my father and me greater confidence and peace of mind throughout the process.
Clement also demonstrated genuine commitment to his clients. He handled our matters diligently and with care, and we always felt that our concerns were taken seriously. His professionalism, legal knowledge, and personal dedication made a significant difference to our experience.
I am truly grateful to Clement for the assistance and support he gave to both my father and me. Finding a lawyer whom you can trust during a difficult legal situation is extremely important, and we were fortunate to have Clement representing and guiding us.
I would have no hesitation in recommending Clement Yong to anyone who requires professional legal assistance, particularly in criminal law matters. Thank you, Clement, for your hard work, patience, and dedicated service to my father and me.
I would like to convey my sincere thanks to Clement and Arika for the guidance and representation they provided. From the very beginning, they demonstrated a thoughtful and well considered approach, combining strong legal knowledge with a clear appreciation of the practical and personal dimensions involved.
One of their key strengths lies in their ability to take complex and sensitive issues and present them in a manner that is clear, logical, and compelling. Their advice was always anchored in sound legal principles, yet carefully tailored to the realities of the situation. There was a consistent sense of discipline in how matters were handled, with each step taken deliberately and with a clear purpose in mind.
Clement and Arika also maintained a high standard of professionalism throughout. They communicated clearly and promptly, and were always willing to take the time to ensure that I fully understood both the process and the reasoning behind each decision. This clarity and transparency made a significant difference, particularly during moments that could otherwise have felt uncertain or overwhelming.
I would like to make specific mention of Arika’s contribution in preparing the legal submissions. Her work was precise, well organised, and firmly grounded in sound legal reasoning. It was evident that considerable thought and care had gone into ensuring that the issues were articulated in a structured and persuasive manner.
What I valued most was their balanced and strategic approach. They did not default to unnecessary confrontation, but instead focused on maintaining credibility, consistency, and a clear long term perspective. This demonstrated not only experience, but also a strong sense of professional integrity.
I hold both Clement and Arika in high regard. Based on my experience working with them across multiple proceedings, I can confidently attest to the consistency and quality of their work. In particular, I am of the view that Clement stands among the few in Singapore who consistently exhibit this level of judgment and professionalism. I would not hesitate to recommend them to anyone seeking dependable and capable legal counsel.
I wish to express my sincere appreciation for the professional support and guidance provided by Clement. From the outset, it was clear that he approached the matter with both intellectual rigour and a strong sense of responsibility, balancing legal precision with a deep awareness of the human dimensions involved.
What stood out most was his ability to distil complex and emotionally charged issues into clear, structured, and persuasive positions. His advice was consistently grounded in sound legal principles, yet never detached from practical realities. He demonstrated a disciplined and measured approach, ensuring that every step taken was deliberate, proportionate, and aligned with the broader objective of achieving a fair and sustainable outcome.
Throughout the process, Clement maintained a high level of professionalism and composure. Communication was always clear, timely, and thoughtful. He took the time to explain not only what needed to be done, but why it mattered, which made a significant difference in navigating what could otherwise have been an overwhelming experience. His ability to provide clarity in moments of uncertainty was particularly valuable.
I also appreciated his strategic judgment. Rather than adopting an unnecessarily adversarial stance, he focused on credibility, consistency, and long term outcomes. This balance between firmness and reasonableness reflected a depth of experience and a genuine commitment to principled advocacy.
In conclusion, I hold Clement in the highest regard and am confident that he is among the very few in Singapore who consistently demonstrate this level of professionalism, judgment, and advocacy. Having had the opportunity to observe and work with him across multiple proceedings, I can personally attest to the consistency and quality of his work. I would recommend him without hesitation to anyone seeking capable and trustworthy counsel.
An exceptionally sharp and insightful lawyer. After just one phone call, he immediately understood the situation and laid out a clear, effective strategy to tackle the case. His confidence, decisiveness, and clarity of thought were very reassuring. Highly recommended if you need someone with a solid mind who knows exactly how to approach a case.