
About
Mr. Dinagaran, also known as Dina, is a Senior Lawyer with decades of experience in all areas of the law and a wealth of knowledge.
Dina is the Managing Partner of Prestige Legal LLP which handles Civil claims, Criminal representations, Family matters (Divorce / PPO/ Adoption), Wills, Probate & Corporate law.
Dina believes that every client is unique and that no 2 cases are the same. Thus, Dina would always have time to listen to the stories of his client to better understand their issues at hand. Dina’s meticulous approach towards his client’s matters has won him many accolades from clients.
Everyone deserves to have their voices heard!
Reviews (26)
Featured Services
Civil Litigation
Mr G. Dingaran's extensive exprience in civil proceedings are brought about from decades of practise and sucessful outcomes.
He has handled cases that pertain to the following;
- Debt Recovery
- Landlord/Tenant Disputes
- Breaches of Contract
- Construction Claims
- Industrial Accident Claims
- Road Traffic Accident Claims
- Coporate Matters
- Bankruptcy Matters
Criminal Defence
Being involved in Criminal Charges brings about a lot of stresses. A lawyer will be able to sit you through such processes and make the whole situation less painful.
Having been involved in many criminal cases over 25 years of practice, Dina had the opportunity to defend clients for the following offences
· Singapore Penal Code
· Misuse of Drugs Act
· Prevention of Corruption Act
· Corruption, Drug Trafficking And Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation Of Benefits) Act (CDSA)
· Securities and Futures Act
· Computer Misuse and Cybersecurity Act
· Moneylenders Act
· Road Traffic Act
· Companies Act
· Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act
· Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act (CLTPA)
· Immigration Act
· Employment of Foreign Manpower Act (EFMA)
· Public Entertainments and Meetings Act (PEMA)
· Corrosive & Explosive Substances Act
Syariah Divorce
Family matters are always stressful especially those that needs to be escalated to the court.
Mr G.Dinagaran has assisted many family matters, including family violence, maintenance, probate, adoption and Youth Court matters,
SYARIAH DIVORCE
Mr Dinagaran has great experience in Muslim Law. During his practice over 21 years he has handled many Syariah Divorce Cases.
A Muslim or Islamic divorce has different considerations and procedures as compared to a divorce from civil marriage.
A divorce has different considerations and procedures as compared to a divorce from civil marriage.
Under section 35 of the Administration of Muslim Law Act (AMLA), the Syariah Court in Singapore has the jurisdiction to hear and determine certain cases that concern marriage, divorce, and other related matters.
Khuluk – (divorce by redemption or compensation)
Cerai taklik – (Divorce by breach of marriage condition)
Fasakh (Annulment of Marriage)
Child custody
Maintenance
Media & Publications
Mr. G Dinagaran has appeared in numerous News Headlines.
I am extremely happy with Mr Dinagaran’s legal advice and their overall experience they had when, dealing with my matter. I am extremely happy to say I will go back again for future.
Excellent service and dealt with my queries efficiently.
Mr. Dinagaran has been professional in the handling of my case. He has also exuded a sharp mind and an extremely well versed knowledge of the law. Mr. Dinagaran has been meticulous in the assessment of my case with detailed analyses and studies of my story. He has helped calm me and from my otherwise very anxious state of mind. He has been very understanding of my plight and has even taken the trouble to visit me on several occasions at my home to put my mind at ease.
My name is Natarajan and I was introduced to Mr G. Dinagaran through a friend. I had met with an accident and my former solicitor filed a Writ of Summons against an Embassy. They managed to serve the Writ on the Embassy. The Embassy’s stand was that they cannot be sued because they have Immunity. I then engaged Mr G. Dinagaran. The Insurance Company tried to strike out my Writ on the basis that I had sued the Embassy. Their argument was that an Embassy was not a Legal entity and therefore cannot be sued. It is a legal entity. Mr G. Dinagaran argued that if an Embassy can own an asset on land, then why could it not be sued. Further, I was injured by the driver who was an employee of the Embassy. Since the accident, the driver had resigned and left the country. Mr G. Dinagaran lost the matter at the State Court. He then appealed on 1st July 2019 Suit no. H/C /RAS/34/2018 to the High Court and told me that I had a very good chance to succeed. Just few days before the hearing, the insurance company through their solicitors had called Mr G. Dinagaran to settle the matter. The matter was settled. Parties agreed for the terms of settlement to be on a confidential basis. Therefore, I cannot disclose the details. I must say Mr G. Dinagaran fought my matter without fear. He wanted justice. He wanted the Embassy to pay for my injuries. It was a long and hard battle. I was very happy when I received the compensation money. I thanked him and I am so grateful to him.