About
Mr. G.Dinagaran, is a Senior Lawyer with decades of experience in all areas of the law and is a wealth of knowledge. He has appeared in numerous headlines in local news.
Mr. G. Dinagaran heads Prestige Legal LLP which handles Civil claims, Criminal representations, Family matters (Divorce / PPO/ Adoption) and Corporate law.
Reviews (22)
Featured Services
Civil Litigation
Mr G. Dingaran's extensive exprience in civil proceedings are brought about from decades of practise and sucessful outcomes.
He has handled cases that pertain to the following;
- Debt Recovery
- Landlord/Tenant Disputes
- Breaches of Contract
- Construction Claims
- Industrial Accident Claims
- Road Traffic Accident Claims
- Coporate Matters
- Bankruptcy Matters
Criminal Defence
Going thru criminal investigations is extremely distressful.
Emotional distresses,constant worries and sleepless nights are are norm when one is facing a criminal charge.
Mr. G. Dinagran's experience in these matters and his knowledge on your rights will help alleviate the stress.
Mr. G. Dinagaran has sucessfully defended people being charged under the following;
· Singapore Penal Code
· Misuse of Drugs Act
· Prevention of Corruption Act
· Corruption, Drug Trafficking And Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation Of Benefits) Act (CDSA)
· Securities and Futures Act
· Computer Misuse and Cybersecurity Act
· Moneylenders Act
· Road Traffic Act
· Companies Act
· Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act
· Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act (CLTPA)
· Immigration Act
· Employment of Foreign Manpower Act (EFMA)
· Public Entertainments and Meetings Act (PEMA)
· Corrosive & Explosive Substances Act
Syariah Divorce
Family matters are always stressful especially those that needs to be escalated to the court.
Mr G.Dinagaran has assisted many family matters, including family violence, maintenance, probate, adoption and Youth Court matters,
SYARIAH DIVORCE
Mr Dinagaran has great experience in Muslim Law. During his practice over 21 years he has handled many Syariah Divorce Cases.
A Muslim or Islamic divorce has different considerations and procedures as compared to a divorce from civil marriage.
A divorce has different considerations and procedures as compared to a divorce from civil marriage.
Under section 35 of the Administration of Muslim Law Act (AMLA), the Syariah Court in Singapore has the jurisdiction to hear and determine certain cases that concern marriage, divorce, and other related matters.
Khuluk – (divorce by redemption or compensation)
Cerai taklik – (Divorce by breach of marriage condition)
Fasakh (Annulment of Marriage)
Child custody
Maintenance
Media & Publications
Mr. G Dinagaran has appeared in numerous News Headlines.
Services & Fees
Fees
Please email : info@prestigellp.com or
Contact : +65 82295493 or +6590670235
Malay Speaking can contact Ms Sal 90173796
Or Whatapp: +65 81450380 for a quote on the fees
Contact our Ms Salmah (For Syariah Matters)
Legal Services
- Divorce
- Debt Recovery
- Deed Polls (Name Change)
- Commercial Disputes
- Personal & Family
- Criminal Defence
- Shareholder Disputes
- Employment Disputes
- Drafting IOU / Debt Acknowledgment
- Building and Construction Claims
- Syariah Divorce
- Landlord-Tenant Disputes
- Magistrate's Complaint
- Civil Litigation
- Muslim Wills and Inheritance
- Bankruptcy
- Personal Protection Order
- Contractual Disputes
- Renovation Claims
- Cybercrime
- Winding Up of Companies
- Commissioner for Oaths
- Civil Claims
- Power of Attorney
- Defamation
- Information / Cybersecurity Review
- Privacy / Data Compliance Review (PDPA)
I am from China, working in Singapore. I was charged by police for voluntarily causing hurt by using a fork to stab the victim twice.
Charge 1 SC 902657-2018 MCN – 900823-2018
The Public prosecutor submitted that I should be sent to prison. I immediately engaged Mr G.Dinagaran. He took active steps and dealt with my case vigorously. He made arrangements for me to view the C.C.T.V footage at the Police Station. The C.C.T.V footage did not reveal that I had used the fork to injure the victim. I also faced another charge of causing voluntary hurt by punching the victim on this chin.
Charge 2 SC 902657-2018 MCN -900824-2018
The prosecution offered to proceed his charge 1 i.e. the using the fork to stab and took into considerations the lesser charge, charge no2, i.e. Punching the victim on the chin. We did not take up the offer. Mr G.Dinagaran advised me to reject the offer. We then claimed trial for both the charges. The matter was fixed on 12.6.2019 in court 18. After a series of representation, and even having my girlfriend called for an interview with the police, nothing changed. We were preparing to fight both the charges. Finally at the 11th hour prosecution proposed to proceed with the lesser charge in punching and took into account the charge using a fork to stab. After Mr Dinagaran pled with the prosecution, they reversed their stand and took the more serious into consideration which they were not agreeable to do so earlier.
The Prosecution reversed their stand and took the more serious chose which allegation were not agreeable to do so earlier into consideration because Mr Dinagaran appealed to the Prosecution & Police. After mitigation I was given a fine. I was very pleased. I thank Mr G.Dinagaran for his great work. I really was very happy to engage his services. I was very happy with the outcome. Thank you Mr Dina.
I met Mr G.Dinagaran sometime in June 2019. I was introduced by my friend who was also represented by Mr G. Dinagaran. Previously, I had engaged another law firm to fight my Personal Protection Order (P.P.O) which my ex-wife had applied for. Many days of hearing went on and I lost the case after a long battle. Only after that, did I meet Mr Dinagaran. He immediately applied to revoke the order under P.P.O. Variation SS1463/2019. He felt that the order was unjust. In fact, there was also an exclusion order which I found to be unfair. Eventually, my ex-wife was agreeable to have the order withdrawn. Mr Dinagaran had also prepared my divorce papers to fight for my Divorce suit no 1967/2019. I find Mr G.Dinagaran to be very helpful. He is very efficient in his work. He is meticulous in reading all my papers pertaining to the case. Even though my matters have not come to an end, I am very sure it will be a happy ending for me. I am very confident Mr G.Dinagaran will help resolve my issues.